A Proposed Model for Detecting Learning Styles Based on the Felder-Silverman Model Using KNN and LR with Electroencephalography (EEG)
Abstract
The identification of learning styles plays a crucial role in enhancing personalized education and optimizing learning outcomes. This research proposes a model for detecting learning styles based on the Felder-Silverman model using two machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Linear Regression (LR). Electroencephalography (EEG) data, known for its ability to capture cognitive and neural activity, serves as the primary dataset for this study. The proposed model was tested on a dataset comprising EEG signals collected during various learning tasks. Feature extraction and preprocessing techniques were employed to ensure high-quality input for the learning algorithms. The experimental results revealed that the LR-based model achieved an accuracy of 96.4%, significantly outperforming the KNN-based model, which obtained an accuracy of 89.9%. These findings highlight the potential of EEG-based models for accurately identifying learning styles, offering valuable insights for educators and researchers aiming to implement adaptive learning systems. This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of combining EEG data with machine learning techniques for learning style detection, paving the way for more personalized and efficient educational approaches. Future research will explore the integration of additional physiological data and advanced machine learning methods to further improve model accuracy and applicability.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
R. Felder and L. Silverman, “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education,” Engineering education, vol. 78, no. June, pp. 674–681, 1988, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2008.4720326.
D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. 1984. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-8.50017-4.
F. Coffield, D. Moseley, E. Hall, and K. Ecclestone, “Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning A systematic and critical review,” 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90483-7.
Hardiansyah, “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran,” Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 110087, 2014.
N. A. Rashid, T. M. Nasir, S. Lias, N. Sulaiman, Z. H. Murat, and R. S. S. Abdul Kadir, “Learners’ Learning Style classification related to IQ and Stress based on EEG,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 29, no. October 2015, pp. 1061–1070, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.339.
L. Duan et al., “Machine Learning Approaches for MDD Detection and Emotion Decoding Using EEG Signals,” Front Hum Neurosci, vol. 14, no. September, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00284.
D. Deenadayalan, A. Kangaiammal, and B. K. Poornima, “EEG Based learner’s learning style and preference prediction for E-learning,” Proceedings of the International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud), I-SMAC 2018, no. 14, pp. 316–320, 2018, doi: 10.1109/I-SMAC.2018.8653693.
B. Zhang, C. Chai, Z. Yin, and Y. Shi, “Design and implementation of an eeg-based learning-style recognition mechanism,” Brain Sci, vol. 11, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050613.
N. Bin Abdul Rashid, M. N. Bin Taib, Z. B. Zunairah, R. S. B. Ros Shilawani, S. Bin Lias, and N. Bin Sulaiman, “Summative EEG alpha classification relates learning style and openness,” IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, no. April, pp. 807–810, 2014, doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826188.
R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding student differences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x.
S. Graf, “Adaptivity in Learning Management Systems Focussing on Learning Styles by,” Vienna University of Technology, 2007.
M. Raleiras, A. H. Nabizadeh, and F. A. Costa, Automatic learning styles prediction: a survey of the State-of-the-Art (2006–2021), vol. 9, no. 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s40692-021-00215-7.
R. Felder and J. Spurlin, “Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles*,” 2005.
T. A. Litzinger, S. H. Lee, J. C. Wise, and R. M. Felder, “A psychometric study of the index of learning styles©,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00941.x.
S. Pagano, L. Lombardi, and V. Mazza, “Brain dynamics of attention and working memory engagement in subitizing,” Brain Res, vol. 1543, pp. 244–252, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.025.
M. A. Ramírez-Moreno et al., “Eeg-based tool for prediction of university students’ cognitive performance in the classroom,” Brain Sci, vol. 11, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060698.
N. A. Rashid, M. N. Taib, S. Lias, and N. Sulaiman, “Implementation of cluster analysis for learning style classification using brain asymmetry,” Proceedings - 2011 IEEE 7th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2011, no. March, pp. 310–313, 2011, doi: 10.1109/CSPA.2011.5759893.
B. Zhang, Y. Shi, L. Hou, Z. Yin, and C. Chai, “Tsmg: A deep learning framework for recognizing human learning style using eeg signals,” Brain Sci, vol. 11, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111397.
E. R. Supriyanto, R. Isnanto, and S. H. Purnomo, “Developing Chicken Health Classification Model Using a Convolutional Neural Network and Support Vector Machine (CNN-SVM) Approach,” Ingenierie des Systemes d’Information, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2525–2532, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.18280/isi.290637.
C. Babiloni et al., “Alpha, beta and gamma electrocorticographic rhythms in somatosensory, motor, premotor and prefrontal cortical areas differ in movement execution and observation in humans,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 641–654, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.068.
R. Yuvaraj et al., “A Machine Learning Framework for Classroom EEG Recording Classification : Unveiling Learning-Style Patterns,” pp. 1–19, 2024.
S. Gupta, P. Kumar, and R. Tekchandani, “A machine learning-based decision support system for temporal human cognitive state estimation during online education using wearable physiological monitoring devices,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 8, no. April, p. 100280, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100280.
E. Başar, C. Başar-Eroǧlu, B. Güntekin, and G. G. Yener, “Brain’s alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and theta oscillations in neuropsychiatric diseases: Proposal for biomarker strategies,” Suppl Clin Neurophysiol, vol. 62, pp. 19–54, 2013, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-5307-8.00002-8.
E. Başar and B. Güntekin, “Review of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma response oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders,” Suppl Clin Neurophysiol, vol. 62, pp. 303–341, 2013, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-5307-8.00019-3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i2.659
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

Journal of Applied Data Sciences
| ISSN | : | 2723-6471 (Online) |
| Publisher | : | Bright Publisher |
| Website | : | http://bright-journal.org/JADS |
| : | taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact) | |
| support@bright-journal.org (technical issues) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0




.png)