.png)
Enhancing Online Batik Shopping Experience through Live Streaming Commerce and the LYFY Application
Abstract
Online batik shopping often results in buyer dissatisfaction due to discrepancies between product descriptions and the actual items received. Static images and text on e-marketplace platforms are insufficient to convey the intricate details of batik designs, leading to mismatches in customer expectations. To mitigate this issue, Live Streaming Commerce (LSC) features, such as those on Shopee Live, allow sellers to showcase products in real-time, providing more accurate representations. However, sellers face challenges in managing overwhelming volume of comments during live streams, making it difficult to prioritize important queries. LYFY, a comment management app developed to streamline these interactions, aims to address this problem by improving the quality of interaction between live streamers and prospective buyers through filtering important comments. This study examines the determinants affecting the adoption of LYFY by online batik vendors. The research integrates the Task-Technology Fit (TTF), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Expectation-Confirmation Model (ECM) frameworks to evaluate LYFY's performance in fulfilling user requirements. Data were collected from 243 respondents with LSC experience, and the research model underwent evaluation through Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The measurement model exhibited high reliability and validity, with values surpassing the suggested thresholds, thereby providing solid support for subsequent analysis. Key factors such as TTF, confirmation, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction were examined to determine their impact on user adoption. The analysis revealed that TTF has the strongest influence on confirmation, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and individual performance. Additionally, perceived ease of use and confirmation substantially influence continuance intentions and satisfaction. These results suggest that enhancing LYFY's task-technology fit and simplifying its user interface are crucial for improving user satisfaction and adoption. By addressing these areas, LYFY can better support live stream sellers, reduce product expectation discrepancies, and improve overall customer experience, particularly in the online batik market.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
T. Wiradinata, T. R. D. Saputri, R. E. Sutanto, and Y. Soekamto, “Online Measuring Feature for Batik Size Prediction using Mobile Device: A Potential Application for a Novelty Technology,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2023.
A. Arora, D. Glaser, P. Kluge, K. Aimee, S. Kohli, and N. Sak, “Live commerce is transforming online shopping | McKinsey,” It’s showtime! How live commerce is transforming the shopping experience. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/its-showtime-how-live-commerce-is-transforming-the-shopping-experience
L. Laurer, “Live Commerce in China: Top Platforms, GMV, Revenue, Market Analysis | ECDB.com,” Live Commerce: Top Chinese Platforms, Revenue & Market Analysis. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ecommercedb.com/insights/livestream-commerce-in-china-taobao-leads-but-its-dominance-fades/4598
B. O. Reddy, S. Bansal, and V. Sikaria, “Indonesia E-commerce Market Size | Mordor Intelligence,” Indonesia e-Commerce Market Size & Share Analysis -Growth Trends & Faorecasts (2024 - 2029). Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/indonesia-ecommerce-market
D. T. Parahyta and N. Sobari, “Effect of Relational Bonds on Consumer Engagement Via Affective Commitment on E-Commerce Live Stream Shopping in Indonesia,” presented at the Brawijaya International Conference on Economics, Business and Finance 2021 (BICEBF 2021), Atlantis Press, Jan. 2022, pp. 143–150. doi: 10.2991/aebmr.k.220128.019.
G. S. A. Refasa, Heriyadi, B. B. Purmono, Barkah, and H. Malini, “Do TikTok Discounts Livestream Triggers Gen Z Impulse Buying Behavior,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Manag. IJSRM, vol. 11, no. 01, Art. no. 01, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.18535/ijsrm/v11i01.em04.
J. K. Yudha, R. Komaladewi, and R. T. B. Yudha, “Effect of Live Streaming E-Commerce in Building Customer Trust and Customer Engagement (study on Tokopedia Consumers),” J. Bus. Stud. MANGEMENT Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.22437/jbsmr.v6i1.20102.
X. Dong, H. Zhao, and T. Li, “The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products.” Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4374
W. Xu, H. Wang, Y. Ji, and W. Yang, “Innovative Integration of E-commerce Live Streaming and Business Communication Skills,” presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Technology and Educational Informatization, ITEI 2023, November 24–26, 2023, Zhengzhou, China, Apr. 2024. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.24-11-2023.2343646
Z. Wang, C. Phawitpiriyakliti, and S. Terason, “The Role of Psychological Factors in Self-Leadership Development an Investigation Among E-Commerce Webcast Streamers,” Migr. Lett., vol. 20, no. S9, pp. 1494–1514, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.59670/ml.v20iS9.5613.
X. Zhang, X. Cheng, X. Huang, and H. Li, Investigating Impulse Buying Behavior in Live Streaming Commerce: The Role of Social Presence. 2022. Accessed: Oct. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/79502
R. Oktaviani, F. D. Murwani, and A. Hermawan, “The Effect of Live Streaming Quality on Purchase Intention through Immersive Experience, Consumer Trust, and Perceived Value (Study of This is April Consumers on TikTok),” Int. J. Bus. Law Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.56442/ijble.v5i1.490.
D. L. Goodhue and R. L. Thompson, “Task-Technology Fit Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Q., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 213–236, 1995, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/249689.
N. Valaei, S. R. Nikhashemi, H. Ha Jin, and M. M. Dent, “Task Technology Fit in Online Transaction Through Apps,” IGI Glob., pp. 236–251, 2018, doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5326-7.ch010.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., no. September, pp. 319–340, 1989.
V. Venkatesh, J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu, “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 2012.
S. Alharbi and S. Drew, “Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. IJACSA, vol. 5, no. 1, Art. no. 1, 33/21 2014, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120.
S. Rahi and M. Abd. Ghani, “Integration of expectation confirmation theory and self-determination theory in internet banking continuance intention,” J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 533–550, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JSTPM-06-2018-0057.
M.-M. Wang, J.-J. Wang, M.-M. Wang, and J.-J. Wang, “Understanding Solvers’ Continuance Intention in Crowdsourcing Contest Platform: An Extension of Expectation-Confirmation Model,” J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 17–33, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.4067/S0718-18762019000300103.
Y.-M. Cheng, “Understanding cloud ERP continuance intention and individual performance: a TTF-driven perspective,” Benchmarking Int. J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1591–1614, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2019-0208.
W.-S. Lin, “Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives,” Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 498–507, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.006.
S. M. Song, E. Kim, R. (Liang) Tang, and R. Bosselman, “Exploring the Determinants of e-Commerce by Integrating a Technology–Organization–Environment Framework and an Expectation–Confirmation Model,” Tour. Anal., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 689–696, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.3727/108354215X14464845878156.
M. Y. Ubaidillah, E. Pramana, and F. H. Chandra, “Continuance Intention Pada Aplikasi Mobile Payment Dengan Menggunakan Extended Expectation Confirmation Model,” JTIM J. Teknol. Inf. Dan Multimed., vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.35746/jtim.v5i2.359.
Q. Zheng, C. Li, and S. Bai, “Evaluating the couriers’ experiences of logistics platform: The extension of expectation confirmation model and technology acceptance model,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998482.
D. L. Goodhue, “Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information System,” Decis. Sci., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 105–138, 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01346.x.
J. D’Ambra, C. S. Wilson, and S. Akter, “Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 48–64, 2013, doi: 10.1002/asi.22757.
A. A. Bailey, I. Pentina, A. S. Mishra, and M. S. Ben Mimoun, “Mobile payments adoption by US consumers: an extended TAM,” Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 626–640, 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-08-2016-0144.
T. Wiradinata, C. Herdinata, S. Christian, and A. Setiobudi, “Accelerating Electronic Wallet Payment Service Adoption in Indonesian Small and Medium-sized Businesses,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Change Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1504/IJISCM.2022.10047700.
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Manag. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000.
G. Widiar, A. Yuniarinto, and I. Yulianti, “Perceived Ease of Use’s Effects on Behavioral Intention Mediated by Perceived Usefulness and Trust,” Interdiscip. Soc. Stud., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1829–1844, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.55324/iss.v2i4.397.
S. Chen, H. Chen, and M. Chen, “Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self‐service technologies,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 1248–1263, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1108/02635570911002306.
C. Liao, P. Palvia, and J.-L. Chen, “Information technology adoption behavior life cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT),” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 309–320, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004.
A. A. Rabaa’i, S. A. ALmaati, and X. Zhu, “Students’ Continuance Intention to Use Moodle: An Expectation-Confirmation Model Approach,” Interdiscip. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag., vol. 16, pp. 397–434, Aug. 2021.
W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “Information Systems Success Measurement,” Found. Trends® Inf. Syst., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–116, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1561/2900000005.
K. W. Cho, S.-K. Bae, J.-H. Ryu, K. N. Kim, C.-H. An, and Y. M. Chae, “Performance Evaluation of Public Hospital Information Systems by the Information System Success Model,” Healthc. Inform. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 43–48, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.1.43.
V. Soodan, A. Rana, A. Jain, and D. Sharma, “AI Chatbot Adoption in Academia: Task Fit, Usefulness and Collegial Ties,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract., vol. 23, p. 001, 2024, doi: 10.28945/5260.
Y. Ouyang, C. Tang, W. Rong, L. Zhang, C. Yin, and Z. Xiong, “Task-technology fit aware expectation-confirmation model towards understanding of MOOCs continued usage,” 2017.
O. Isaac, Z. Abdullah, T. Ramayah, and A. M. Mutahar, “Internet usage, user satisfaction, task-technology fit, and performance impact among public sector employees in Yemen,” Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 210–241, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJILT-11-2016-0051.
I. M. Klopping and E. McKinney, “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-Commerce,” Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform. J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2004.
Y. Li and J. Wang, “Evaluating the Impact of Information System Quality on Continuance Intention Toward Cloud Financial Information System,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713353.
J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM Article information,” 2018. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i1.504
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
| ISSN | : | 2723-6471 (Online) |
| Publisher | : | Bright Publisher |
| Website | : | http://bright-journal.org/JADS |
| : | taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact) | |
| support@bright-journal.org (technical issues) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0