Transforming Mathematics Learning: Students' Integrative Skills in Technology and Pedagogy

Muhammad Turmuzi, Nurul Hikmah, Junaidi Junaidi

Abstract


In the digital age, mastering the topic or developing pedagogical design skills alone is no longer sufficient for instructors or aspiring math educators. They also need to be able to make connections between the two. In addition, other specialized abilities are required, such as the ability to use technology for learning (technological skills). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) is a common term for this skill. TPACK is a framework that helps educators integrate technology into learning effectively. TPACK covers three main types of knowledge-Technology, Pedagogy, and Content, and how the combination of these three elements creates a more meaningful learning experience for students. This study aims to assess the TPACK teaching abilities of aspiring mathematics teachers in the Microteaching course. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method, which describes the object of research in its original form without quantitative measurement or manipulation of variables but focuses on describing the observed phenomena. In this instance, the study provides a general picture of how well math education students comprehend and utilize their TPACK. A Likert scale measures an individual's or group's attitudes, views, and perceptions concerning social phenomena to ascertain their understanding of TPACK. Twenty University of Mataram students enrolled in the Microteaching course in Mathematics Education served as the research subjects. Based on the findings of the research and discussion, it can be said that students applying TPACK to learning have an average score of 3.88 medium categories for technological pedagogical knowledge, 3.82 medium categories for pedagogical knowledge, and 3.63 medium categories for content knowledge. Since most students are already familiar with the TPACK instrument, their total TPACK ability has an average score of 3.89, which is considered to be medium.


Keywords


TPACK; Transforming; Mathematics learning; Technology; Pedagogy

Full Text:

PDF

References


H. Jusuf, “Improving Teacher Quality, a Keyword for Improving Education Facing Global Challenges,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1303–6521, 2005, doi: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102409.

R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “How to Improve Teaching Quality,” Qual. Manag. J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–21, 1999, doi: 10.1080/10686967.1999.11919183.

A. S. Munna and M. A. Kalam, “Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: literature review,” Int. J. Humanit. Innov., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2021, doi: 10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102.

J. Yip, S. H. Wong, K. L. Yick, K. Chan, and K. H. Wong, “Improving quality of teaching and learning in classes by using augmented reality video,” Comput. Educ., vol. 128, pp. 88–101, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.014.

A. Miguel and Cardona, “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning,” Off. Educ. Technol., no. May, pp. 1–64, 2023, doi: https://tech.ed.gov.

A. H. Sequeira, “Introduction to Concepts of Teaching and Learning,” SSRN Electron. J., no. July, 2012, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2150166.

F. Zhang, “Significances of Multimedia Technologies Training,” Phys. Procedia, vol. 33, pp. 2005–2010, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.315.

S. Park and V. Gentry, “Promoting Pre-Service Teachers’ Multimedia Design Skills through Collaborative Multimedia Service-Learning (CMSL).,” J. Serv. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://journals.sfu.ca/jslhe/index.php/jslhe/article/view/122

M. D. Abdulrahaman et al., “Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05312, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312.

H. Nauman Ahmed, A. Rizwan Pasha, and M. Malik, “The Role of Teacher Training Programs in Optimizing Teacher Motivation and Professional Development Skills,” Bull. Educ. Res., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 17–37, 2021, doi: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1338294.

J. Bundsgaard and T. I. Hansen, “Evaluation of learning materials: A holistic Framework,” J. Learn. Des., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 31–44, 2011, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v4i4.87.

U. B.-A. Ordu, “The Role of Teaching and Learning Aids/Methods in a Changing World,” Bulg. Comp. Educ. Soc., vol. 19, pp. 210–216, 2021, doi: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613989.pdf.

Q. Irah Larasati, A. Cahyaningtyas, A. Mangzila, A. Agus Firawati, S. Munirotul Yuanita, and I. Lesmana, “The Role and Function of Teachers in Improving Effective Learning in Classes,” vol. 381, no. CoEMA, pp. 13–17, 2020, doi: 10.2991/coema-19.2019.4.

R. Tripathi, “Importance and Improvements in Teaching-Learning process through Effective Evaluation Methodologies,” ESSENCE Int. J. Environ. Rehabil. Conserv., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 7–16, 2018, doi: 10.31786/09756272.18.9.2.202.

A. Remesh, “Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching,” J. Res. Med. Sci., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 158–163, 2013, doi: PMC3724377.

M. R. Msimanga, “The Impact of Micro Teaching Lessons on Teacher Professional Skills: Some Reflections from South African Student Teachers,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 164, 2020, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p164.

A. Kilic, “Learner-Centered Micro Teaching in Teacher Education.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77–100, 2010, doi: https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2010_1_5.pdf.

N. Sugihartini, G. P. Sindu, K. S. Dewi, M. Zakariah, and P. Sudira, “Improving Teaching Ability with Eight Teaching Skills,” vol. 394, no. Icirad 2019, pp. 306–310, 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200115.050.

C. Wardoyo, Y. D. Satrio, and D. A. Ratnasari, “An analysis of teachers’ pedagogical and professional competencies in the 2013 Curriculum with the 2017-2018 revision in Accounting subject,” Res. Eval. Educ., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2020, doi: 10.21831/reid.v6i2.35207.

B. Martin, “Successful Implementation of TPACK in Teacher Preparation Programs,” Int. J. Integr. Technol. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2015, doi: 10.5121/ijite.2015.4102.

D. A. Schmidt, A. D. Thompson, M. J. Koehler, and T. S. Shin, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 2, p. 2531p, 2014.

R. Rohmitawati, “The Implementation of TPACK (Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge) Framework on Indonesian Online Mathematics Teachers Training,” Southeast Asian Math. Educ. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2018, doi: 10.46517/seamej.v8i1.64.

P. Nuangchalerm, “Tpack in asean perspectives: Case study on thai pre-service teacher,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 993–999, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20700.

P. Nithitakkharanon and P. Nuangchalerm, “Enhancing pre-service teachers in learning management competency by TPACK framework study and professional requirement,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1473–1479, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22181.

L. Doyle, C. McCabe, B. Keogh, A. Brady, and M. McCann, “An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research,” J. Res. Nurs., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 443–455, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1744987119880234.

H. Kim, J. S. Sefcik, and C. Bradway, “Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review,” J. Career Tech. Educ., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2017, doi: 10.21061/jcte.v21i1.647.

U. Flick, “Qualitative Research Designs,” Des. Qual. Res., pp. 36–50, 2012, doi: 10.4135/9781849208826.n4.

L. A. Palinkas et al., “Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research,” HHS Public Access, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 533–544, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.Purposeful.

M. Schmid, E. Brianza, and D. Petko, “Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model,” Comput. Educ., vol. 157, no. June, p. 103967, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103967.

Y. Cui and H. Zhang, “Integrating teacher data literacy with TPACK: A self-report study based on a novel framework for teachers’ professional development,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966575.

E. S. Bahriah and L. Yunita, “Investigating the Competencies of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Self-Efficacy of Chemistry Teachers,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1233, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012021.

W. N. Yanuarto, S. M. Maat, and H. Husnin, “A measurement model of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in Indonesian senior mathematics teachers’ scenario,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1663, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012018.

A. Diamah et al., “Evaluating the effectiveness of technological pedagogical content knowledge-based training program in enhancing pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. August, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.897447.

G. N. H. Nguyen, M. Bower, and M. Stevenson, “The discourse of design: Patterns of TPACK Contribution during pre-service teacher learning design conversations,” Educ. Inf. Technol., pp. 8235–8264, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10932-w.

A. J. B. Hutauruk, “Karakteristik Etnomatematika dalam Pembelajaran Sekolah,” 2020, repository.uhn.ac.id. [Online]. Available: http://repository.uhn.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/3963/Prosiding-Webinar-Nasional.pdf?sequence=14&isAllowed=y#page=63

M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, and W. Cain, “What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?,” J. Educ., vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 13–19, 2013, doi: 10.1177/002205741319300303.

P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge,” Teach. Coll. Rec. Voice Scholarsh. Educ., vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, 2006, doi: 10.1177/016146810610800610.

M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, M. Akcaoglu, and J. M. Rosenberg, “The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework for Teachers and Teacher Educators,” ICT Integr. Teach. mducation Model., no. December, pp. 1–8, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://cemca.org.in/ckfinder/userfiles/files/ICT teacher education Module 1 Final_May 20.pdf

B. Kartal and C. Çinar, “Examining Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs of TPACK during a Method Course and Field Experience.,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 11–37, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2018.03.002.

E. Lindenbauer and Z. Lavicza, “From research to practice: Diagnosing and enhancing students’ conceptions in a formative assessment tool utilizing digital worksheets in functional thinking,” Int. J. Technol. Math. Educ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 133–141, 2021, doi: 10.1564/tme_v28.4.03.

G. de Freitas and E. D. Spangenberg, “Mathematics teachers’ levels of technological pedagogical content knowledge and information and communication technology integration barriers,” Pythagoras, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: 10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V40I1.431.

M. E. Matthews and L. Callis, “What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?,” Journ al Educ., vol. 193, no. 3, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/15171205/What_is_technological_pedagogical_content_TPACK_

M. Xiao, Z. Tian, and W. Xu, “Impact of teacher-student interaction on students’ classroom well-being under online education environment,” Educ. Inf. Technol., 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11681-0.

E. B. Turnuklu and S. Yesildere, “The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: preservice primary mathematics teachers’ perspectives in Turkey,” IUMPST J., vol. 1, no. October, pp. 1–13, 2007.

C. Jeschke, C. Kuhn, A. Heinze, O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, H. Saas, and A. M. Lindmeier, “Teachers’ Ability to Apply Their Subject-Specific Knowledge in Instructional Settings—A Qualitative Comparative Study in the Subjects Mathematics and Economics,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, no. July, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.683962.

C. Lee Shing, R. Mohd Saat, and S. Heng Loke, “The Knowledge of Teaching-Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK),” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 40–55, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.moj-es.net

J. A. Creasy, P. R. Whipp, and B. Jackson, “Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and students’ learning outcomes in ball game instruction,” J. Res., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2011.

M. A. Aqib, M. T. Budiarto, and P. Wijayanti, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Prospective Mathematics Teacher in Three Dimensional Material Based on Sex Differences,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 947, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012069.

R. C. Smith, S. Kim, and L. McIntyre, “Relationships Between Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs and TPACK,” Technol. Res. Reports, no. 1993, pp. 1218–1226, 2015.

A. Dreher, A. Lindmeier, A. Heinze, and C. Niemand, “What Kind of Content Knowledge do Secondary Mathematics Teachers Need?: A Conceptualization Taking into Account Academic and School Mathematics,” J. fur Math., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 319–341, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s13138-018-0127-2.

J. Harris, P. Mishra, and M. Koehler, “Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration refrained,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 393–416, 2009, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536.

J. M. Santos and R. D. R. Castro, “Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST),” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100110, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110.

T. Listiawan, P. Purwanto, A. R. As’Ari, and M. Muksar, “Mathematics Teachers Technological Content Knowledge (TCK) in using Dynamic Geometry Software,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1114, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012121.

N. Bretscher, “Conceptualising TPACK Within Mathematics Education: Teachers’ Strategies for Capitalising on Transitions Within and Beyond Dynamic Geometry Software,” Digit. Exp. Math. Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 232–254, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40751-022-00115-0.

D. Muhtadi, Wahyudin, B. G. Kartasasmita, and R. C. I. Prahmana, “The Integration of technology in teaching mathematics,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 943, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012020.

J. H. Van Driel and A. Berry, “Pedagogical Content Knowledge,” Int. Encycl. Educ. Third Ed., pp. 656–661, 2009, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00642-4.

N. Aminah and I. Wahyuni, “The ability of pedagogic content knowledge (PCK) of mathematics teacher candidate based on multiple intelligent,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1280, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042050.

Karim and A. Danaryanti, “How to develop PCK ability for prospective mathematics teachers? the case of lesson study-based field experience practice,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1422, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1422/1/012006.

F. Fitriati, R. Rosli, and Z. H. Iksan, “Enhancing prospective mathematics teachers’ lesson planning skills through lesson study within school university partnership program,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 69–84, 2023, doi: 10.22342/JME.V14I1.PP69-84.

Muhtarom, D. Juniati, and T. Y. E. Siswono, “Examining prospective teachers’ belief and pedagogical content knowledge towards teaching practice in mathematics class: A case study,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 185–202, 2019, doi: 10.22342/jme.10.2.7326.185-202.

C. E. Taylor and A. Appova, “Providing opportunities to develop prospective teachers’ Providing opportunities to develop prospective teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge pedagogical content knowledge Aina Appova Providing Opportunities to Develop Prospective Teachers’ Pedagogical,” Math. Enthus., vol. 17, pp. 673–724, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme

H. Y. Lee, C. Y. Chung, and G. Wei, “Research on Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2011 to 2020,” Front. Educ., vol. 7, no. February, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.765233.

T. Valtonen et al., “Emerging imbalance in the development of TPACK - A challenge for teacher training,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 5363–5383, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11426-5.

B. Evrim, C. Hsueh-Hua, and T. Ann, “TPACK : an Emerging Research and Development Tool for,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. –, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 370–377, 2011.

N. R. Dewi et al., “Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK) Research Trends: A Systematic Literature Review of Publications Between 2010 - 2020,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 589–604, 2021, doi: 10.36681/tused.2021.92.

Á. A. Jiménez Sierra, J. M. Ortega Iglesias, J. Cabero-Almenara, and A. Palacios-Rodríguez, “Development of the teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) from the Lesson Study: A systematic review,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. February, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1078913.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i2.482

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0