Polarization of Religious Issues in Indonesia’s Social Media Society and Its Impact on Social Conflict

Barzan Faizin, Susanti Ainul Fitri, Enjang AS, Dian Sa'adillah Maylawati, Naufal Rizqullah, Muhammad Ali Ramdhani

Abstract


In this new era, people use social media to share information and discuss political, social, and religious issues, leading to pros and cons arguments. In Twitter’s hashtags and tweets, religious issues frequently trigger a hot conversation that causes disputes among citizens and even street movements. This study is intended to reveal the religious issues that often trigger polarization among Twitter users and how they influence horizontal conflict in society as what happened during the election period in 2019. This research applied mixed methods with social media analytics to conceal religious issues in Indonesia's social media society. The data collection was done by crawling data from the Indonesian Twitter users’ tweets regarding religious issues hashtags, which is a reference for further analysis. The research findings show that the top eight religious issues widely discussed based on 23,433 Twitter users’ tweets are the hashtags (#) salafi, wahabi, intoleransi (intolerance), taliban, anti-Pancasila, politisasi agama (politicization of religion), politik identitas (identity politics), and radikalisme (radicalism). In social conversation networks, these issues are related to each other and other issues such as political figures, the three presidential candidates, the general election, and the Republic of Indonesia presidential election in 2024. Concerning these issues, Twitter users believe that the issues, positive or negative, do not influence their religious and political stance. However, to a certain extent, they believe that religious issues impact social discourses regarding horizontal conflicts. 44% opinions prove this indicated that the debate over religious matters had little influence on their opinion of these topics, and 64.5% agreed that religious concerns can cause social strife. Finally, it is hoped that further studies will elaborate on how religious issues on Twitter and other social media directly impact social harmony in everyday life.


Keywords


Polarization; Religious Issues; Social Media Analytics; Social Conflict

Full Text:

PDF

References


I. Irwandi and E. R. Chotim, “Analisis konflik antara masyarakat, pemerintah dan swasta,” JISPO Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 24–42, 2017.

Y. S. Lestari, “Politik Identitas Di Indonesia: Antara Nasionalisme Dan Agama,” Journal of Politics and Policy, pp. 19–30, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jppol.2018.001.01.2.

D. Y. King, Half-hearted reform: electoral institutions and the struggle for democracy in Indonesia. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2003.

A. Azra, “Political Islam in Post-Soeharto Indonesia,” Islamic perspectives on the new millennium, pp. 133–149, 2004.

N. Hasan, “Laskar Jihad; Islam, militansi dan pencarian identitas di Indonesia Pasca-Orde Baru,” 2008.

J. Abbink, “Religion and Violence in the Horn of Africa: Trajectories of Mimetic Rivalry and Escalation between ‘Political Islam’ and the State,” Politics, Religion & Ideology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 194–215, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/21567689.2020.1754206.

T. Sajjad and A. C. Härdig, “Too many enemies: Mobilization, marginalization, and political violence,” Terrorism and Political Violence, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1106–1125, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1080/09546553.2015.1127807.

S. Mujani, R. W. Liddle, and K. Ambardi, Voting behavior in Indonesia since democratization: Critical democrats. Cambridge University Press, 2018.

J. Ausserhofer and A. Maireder, “National Politics on Twitter,” Inf Commun Soc, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 291–314, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050.

M. Tazri, “Cebong Dan Kampret Dalam Pespektif Komunikasi Politik Indonesia,” Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik dan Komunikasi Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.24853/pk.3.1.1-7.

A. Sonjaya and B. Rahayu Diningrat, “Relasi Agama dan Politik di Indonesia,” JCIC : Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 21–28, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.51486/jbo.v5i1.82.

M. Mietzner, Reinventing Asian populism: Jokowi’s rise, democracy, and political contestation in Indonesia. JSTOR, 2015.

V. R. Hadiz, Populisme Islam di Indonesia dan Timur Tengah. LP3ES, 2021.

B. Simanjuntak, “Ujaran Kebencian di Ranah Digital: Korban, Pelaku, dan Metode Penanganan,” Jakarta, 2022.

I. Fahmi, “Sejarah Polarisasi Netizen Di Indonesia: Tren Dan Popularitas Sebutan Cebong, Kampret, Buzerp, Dan Kadrun,” 2022. Accessed: Jan. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://twitter.com/ismailfahmi/status/1515598430655037441

S. Samir and M. H. Basyar, “Kegagalan Demokratisasi Di Mesir Pasca-Arab Spring,” Jurnal Penelitian Politik, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v18i2.1051.

D. Sharp, “Democratic citizenship and polarization: Robert Talisse’s theory of democracy,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 701–708, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10677-022-10314-8.

A. A. Arugay and D. Slater, “Polarization Without Poles: Machiavellian Conflicts and the Philippines’ Lost Decade of Democracy, 2000–2010,” Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 122–136, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0002716218810385.

A. G. Karim, “Mengelola Polarisasi Politik dalam Sirkulasi Kekuasaan di Indonesia: Catatan bagi Agenda Riset,” Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, vol. 10, no. 0, p. 2, 2019.

E. Warburton, “How polarised is Indonesia and why does it matter?,” Democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression, pp. 63–80, 2020.

Afrimadona, “Revisiting Political Polarisation in Indonesia: A Case Study of Jakarta’s Electorate,” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 315–339, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1177/18681034211007490.

W. R. Jati, “Polarization of Indonesian Society during 2014-2020: Causes and Its Impacts toward Democracy,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 152–167, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.22146/jsp.66057.

F. L. F. Lee, “Impact of social media on opinion polarization in varying times,” Communication and the Public, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–71, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2057047315617763.

D. Wollebæk, R. Karlsen, K. Steen-Johnsen, and B. Enjolras, “Anger, Fear, and Echo Chambers: The Emotional Basis for Online Behavior,” Soc Media Soc, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 205630511982985, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2056305119829859.

M. Del Vicario et al., “The spreading of misinformation online,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 554–559, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113.

T. Pepinsky, “Islam and Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election,” Asia Policy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 54–62, 2019.

D. Fossati, “The Resurgence of Ideology in Indonesia: Political Islam, Aliran and Political Behaviour,” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 119–148, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1868103419868400.

Edward Aspinall, “Oligarchic Populism: Prabowo Subianto’s Challenge to Indonesian Democracy,” Indonesia, no. 99, p. 1, 2015, doi: 10.5728/indonesia.99.0001.

B. Muhtadi, “Islamic Populism and Voting Trends in Indonesia,” 2021.

G. Fealy, “Jokowi in the Covid-19 Era: Repressive Pluralism, Dynasticism and the Overbearing State,” Bull Indones Econ Stud, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 301–323, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1080/00074918.2020.1846482.

P. Kottler and K. L. Keller, “Handbook Of Research Of Effective Advertising Strategies In The Social Media Age,” 2016, Cambridge: IGI Global.

V. Taprial and P. Kanwar, Understanding social media. Bookboon, 2012.

K. Polanco-Levicán and S. Salvo-Garrido, “Understanding Social Media Literacy: A Systematic Review of the Concept and Its Competences,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 14, p. 8807, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148807.

J.-H. Kim, R. Sabherwal, G.-W. Bock, and H.-M. Kim, “Understanding Social Media Monitoring and Online Rumors,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 507–519, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2020.1762260.

E. J. Thaib, Problematika Dakwah Di Media Sosial. Insan Cendekia Mandiri, 2021.

B. Bergie, J. Hodson, and N. Rambukkana, “The Twitter citizen: Problematizing traditional media dominance in an online political discussion,” Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks, pp. 255–265, 2015.

M. Zhang, F.-R. Sheu, and Y. Zhang, “Understanding Twitter use by major LIS professional organisations in the United States,” J Inf Sci, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 165–183, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0165551516687701.

F. K. R. Mahfud, “Sentiment Analysis of Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia Through Social Media Twitter,” MATICS, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 90, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.18860/mat.v12i1.8973.

S. Rocheleau and M. Millette, “Meta-hashtag and tag co-occurrence: from organization to politics in the French Canadian Twitter sphere,” Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, vol. 103, pp. 243–254, 2015.

A. Jungherr, “Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Information Technology & Politics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 72–91, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401.

E. M. Setiadi, “Pengantar Sosiologi: pemahaman fakta dan gejala permasalahan sosial: teori, aplikasi, dan pemecahannya,” 2011.

L. A. Coser, “Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change,” Br J Sociol, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 197, Sep. 1957, doi: 10.2307/586859.

D. Narwoko and B. Suyanto, “Sosiologi Teks Pengantar Dan Terapan: Jakarta,” Kencana, Prenada Media Group, 2007.

J. W. Creswell, “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Aproaches,” SAGE Publications, 2007, doi: 10.4135/9781849208956.

I. Hermawan, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed Method. Kuningan: Hidayatul Quran, 2019.

A. Cropley, “Introduction to qualitative research methods: A practice-oriented introduction for students of psychology and education,” Open access-doi, vol. 10, 2021.

J. A. Maxwell and L. E. Reybold, “Qualitative Research,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2015. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10558-6.

J. S. Tracy, Qualitative Research Methods. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.

M. T. Bevan, “Advancing Qualitative Methods,” Advancing Qualitative Methods, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 136–144, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1049732313519710.

K. Williamson, L. M. Given, and P. Scifleet, “Qualitative data analysis,” in Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts: Second Edition, 2018. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00019-4.

M. Sponder and G. F. Khan, “An Introduction to Social Media Analytics,” in Digital Analytics for Marketing, Routledge, 2017, pp. 167–188. doi: 10.4324/9781315640914-8.

R. Andryani, E. S. Negara, and D. Triadi, “Social Media Analytics: Data Utilization of Social Media for Research,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 193–205, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.33557/journalisi.v1i2.23.

T. Ambler, “Social Media Analytics,” Int J Advert, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 918–919, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.2501/IJA-30-5-918-919.

Č. Kalinić and M. D. Vujičić, “Social Media Analytics,” 2022, pp. 385–410. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8528-3.ch021.

Sheik Abdullah A. and Abiramie Shree T. G. R., “Social Network Analysis,” 2020, pp. 107–117. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-9750-6.ch006.

S. Srivastava, M. K. Singh, and Y. N. Singh, “Social Media Analytics: Current Trends and Future Prospects,” 2021, pp. 1005–1016. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-1089-9_78.

P. Koukaras and C. Tjortjis, “Social Media Analytics, Types and Methodology,” 2019, pp. 401–427. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15628-2_12.

W. J. Scarborough, “Feminist Twitter and Gender Attitudes: Opportunities and Limitations to Using Twitter in the Study of Public Opinion,” Socius, vol. 4, p. 237802311878076, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1177/2378023118780760.

T. Sauter and A. Bruns, “# auspol: The hashtag as community, event, and material object for engaging with Australian politics,” Hashtag publics: The power and politics of discursive networks [Digital Formations, Volume 103], pp. 47–59, 2015.

C. K. Riessman, Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage, 2008.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i1.447

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0