.png)
Implementation of Blended Learning System in Higher Education to Explore the Interaction of Technology, Organization, Environment, and Technology Acceptance Model
Abstract
A thorough examination of the deployment of blended learning after the COVID-19 pandemic is necessary to ensure its efficacy in enhancing the educational quality in higher education. The objective of this study is to identify the key elements that strongly impact the adoption of a blended learning system. It will be achieved by applying both the technology-organization-environment framework and the technology acceptance model. The study formulated eight hypotheses and administered online surveys on social media platforms to gather data from a total of 249 participants from four Islamic state universities. Analyzed data with the PLS methodology. The findings indicated that 92% of participants concurred that blended learning enhanced the quality of education. In addition, seven assumptions have been accepted, with the relationship between the technology context and the perceived ease of use in the blended learning system being the most relevant component. On the other hand, the PLS prediction results demonstrate that the suggested model possesses moderate predictive capability, as evidenced by its lower RMSE and MAE values in comparison to the linear regression model. Subsequent investigations should focus on analyzing the four blended learning models while taking into account factors such as teacher competence, educational systems, and social impacts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
F. Harahap, N. E. A. Nasution, and B. Manurung, “The effect of blended learning on student’s learning achievement and science pro_cess skills in plant tissue culture course,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 521–538, 2019.
Yustina, W. Syafii, and R. Vebrianto, “The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers’ creative thinking skills through online learning in the COVID-19 pandemic,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 408–420, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706.
Y. Jeon, J. Kim, W. Choi, and S.-I. Na, “Developing the competencies of vocational teachers in the age of 4th industrial revolution,” in 13th AASVET International Conference, 2017, pp. 93–93.
T. Resmiaty, U. A. Chaeruman, and D. Kusumawardani, “The implementation of blended learning in the new normal era at vocational school of health,” Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 182–191, 2021, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v11i2.42495.
A. Schleicher, “The impact of covid-19 on education: Insights from ‘education at a glance 2020’.,” OECD Publishing, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED616315 (accessed May 2, 2024).
D. Rustandi, “Dirjen Dikti: Tri Dharma Perguruan tinggi tidak berhenti meski pandemi Covid-19,” Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/10/dirjen-dikti-tri-dharma-perguruan-tinggi-tidak-berhenti-meski-pandemi-covid19 (accessed May 2, 2024).
M. G. Moore and G. Kearsly, “Distance education: a systems view of online learning,” Taylor & Francis Online, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 800, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00131911.2020.1766204.
H. A. Maulana and M. Hamidi, “Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran daring pada mata kuliah praktik di pendidikan vokasi,” Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 224–231, 2020, doi: 10.26618/equilibrium.v8i2.3443.
M. Sholichin, Z. Zulyusri, L. Lufri, and A. Razak, “Analisis kendala pembelajaran online selama pandemi covid-19 pada mata pelajaran IPA di SMPN 1 bayung lencir,” Biodik, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–168, 2020, doi: 10.22437/bio.v7i2.12926.
L. Harasim, Learning Theory and Online Technologies, 2nd Editio. New York: Routledge, 2017.
C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing, 2012.
T. A. Aslamiyah, P. Setyosari, and H. Praherdhiono, “Blended Learning dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan,” Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Education, Society, and Humanity, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 109–114, 2023, doi: 10.17977/um038v2i22019p109.
W. W. Porter, C. R. Graham, K. R. Spring, and K. R. Welch, “Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation,” Computer & Education, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 185–195, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011.
F. Sayekti and P. Putarta, “Penerapan technology acceptance model (TAM) dalam pengujian model penerimaan sistem informasi keuangan daerah,” Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan| Journal of Theory and Applied Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 196–209, 2016, doi: 10.20473/jmtt.v9i3.3075.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 319–339, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
S. Tripopsakul, “Social media adoption as a business platform: an integrated TAM-TOE framework,” Polish Journal of Management Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 350–362, 2018, doi: 10.17512/pjms.2018.18.2.28.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2011.
E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (Fourth Edition). New York: The Free Press, 1995.
Y. Lai, H. Sun, and J. Ren, “Understanding the determinants of big data analytics (BDA) adoption in logistics and supply chain management: An empirical investigation,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 676–703, 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-06-2017-0153.
Y. Li, Q. Wang, and J. Lei, “Modeling chinese teachers’ attitudes toward using technology for teaching with a sem approach,” Taylor & Francis Online, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 122–141, 2019, doi: 10.1080/07380569.2019.1600979.
H.-F. Lin, “Understanding the determinants of electronic supply chain management system adoption: Using the technology–organization–environment framework,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 80–92, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.001.
F. Chen, A. M. Lui, and S. M. Martinell, “A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education,” pubmed, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 585–597, 2017, doi: 10.1111/medu.13272.
A. M. Bliuc, P. Goodyear, and R. A. Ellis, “Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 206–221, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001.
M. J. Kintu, C. Zhu, and E. Kagambe, “Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 7, 2017.
V. K. Ceylan and A. Elitok Kesici, “Effect of blended learning to academic achievement,” Journal of Human Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 308, 2017, doi: 10.14687/jhs.v14i1.4141.
B. Means, Y. Toyoma, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones, “Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies,” 2019.
J. S. Martin, J. E. Kreiger, and A. L. Apicerno, “Effectiveness of a hybrid classroom in the delivery of medical terminology course content relative to a traditional classroom format,” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 72–81, 2015, doi: 10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13994.
J. L. Chong and K. Olesen, “A technology-organization-environment perspective on eco-effectiveness: A meta-analysis,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2017, doi: 10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1441.
L. H. Mahirah, K. Sisilia, and R. Setyorini, “Analisis TOE mempengaruhi adopsi media sosial untuk produk UMKM di sentra kreasi kabupaten bandung,” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 176–194, 2022, doi: 10.31955/mea.v6i3.2247.
Y. Religia, M. Ekhsan, M. Huda, and A. D. Fitriyanto, “TOE framework for e-commerce adoption by msmes during the covid-19 pandemic: can trust moderate?,” Applied Information System and Management (AISM), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2023, doi: 10.15408/aism.v6i1.30954.
Y. Religia, S. Surachman, F. Rohman, and N. K. Indrawati, “E-Commerce adoption in SMEs: A literature review,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics Engineering and Social Science, 2020, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.4108/eai.17-7-2020.2302969.
S. Chandra and K. N. Kumar, “Exploring factors influencing organizational adoption of augmented reality in e-commerce: empirical analysis using technology–organization–environment model,” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 237–265, 2018, doi: http://www.jecr.org/node/556.
O. Ali, A. Shrestha, V. Osmanaj, and S. Muhammed, “Cloud computing technology adoption: An evaluation of key factors in local governments,” Information Technology & People, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 666–703, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2019-0119.
Sukardi, Hasyim, and Supriyantoro, “Using the technology-organization-environment framework approach in the acceptance of telemedicine in the health care industry,” European Journal of Business and Management Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 47–54, 2021, doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.837.
L. G. Tornatzky and M. Fleischer, The process of technological Innovation. Lexington MA: D.C. Heath & Company, 1990.
I. Ahmed, “Technology organization environment framework in cloud computing,” Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 716–725, 2020, doi: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v18i2.13871.
J. Baker, “The Technology-Organization-Environment Framework,” in Integrated Series in Information Systems, Springer, New York, NY, 2011, pp. 232–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12.
T. H. Nguyen, X. C. Le, and T. H. L. Vu, “An extended technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework for online retailing utilization in digital transformation: empirical evidence from vietnam,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/joitmc8040200.
L. Hashimy, G. Jain, and E. Grifell-Tatjé, “Determinants of blockchain adoption as decentralized business model by Spanish firms – an innovation theory perspective,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 204–228, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-01-2022-0030.
S. S. Abed, “Social commerce adoption using TOE framework: An empirical investigation of Saudi Arabian SMEs,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 53, no. 1, p. 102118, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102118.
N. T. Chau and H. Deng, “Critical Determinants for mobile commerce adoption in vietnamese SMEs: A conceptual framework,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 433–440, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.061.
M. Q. Huda, R. Irawan, N. Kumaladewi, and M. Y. Koondhar, “Evaluating social technology utilization on employee performance using positivism paradigm,” Appl. Inf. Syst. Manage. (AISM), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–96, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.15408/aism.v5i2.22978.
P. Chwelos, I. Benbasat, and A. S. Dexter, “Empirical test of an electronic data interchange adoption model,” Information Systems Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 304–321, 2001.
i. A. Khumaidi and r. H. Kusumaningtyas, “Technology acceptance model perilaku pengguna pada sistem enterprise dompet dhuafa,” Applied Information System and Management (AISM), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2021, doi: 10.15408/aism.v4i1.19484.
L. Setiyani, “Using technology acceptance model 3 (TAM 3) at Selected private technical high school: Google drive storage in e-learning,” Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80–89, 2021, doi: 10.31849/utamax.v3i2.6746.
A. Palapa and I. Saifudin, “Analisa pengaruh technology acceptance model (tam) pada aplikasi pendaftaran penilaian training record book (smile 05) studi pada PUKP 05 semarang,” Majalah Ilmiah Bahari Jogja, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 70–86, 2021, doi: 10.33489/mibj.v19i1.259.
K. R. Siregar, “Kajian mengenai penerimaan teknologi dan informasi menggunakan technology accaptance model (TAM),” Rekayasa, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.21107/rekayasa.v4i1.2322.
N. Safitri, “Model kesuksesan sistem teknologi informasi delone & mclean pada sistem informasi pengelolaan proyek,” Informatics for Educators and Professional: Journal of Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 173-182, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.51211/itbi.v4i2.1346.
S. R. Wicaksono, Teori Dasar: Technology Acceptance Model. Malang: C.V Seribu Bintang, 2022.
Rinwantin and Y. Pujiastuti, “TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) Approach to Analyze Community’s Interest in Using E-money,” Journal of Applied Sciences in Accounting, Finance, and Tax, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: 10.31940/jasafint.v5i1.1-10.
A. Syafrizal, E. Ernawati, and Y. Dwiandiyanta, “Penerapan model technology acceptance model (TAM) untuk pemahaman media pembelajaran berbasis multimedia interaktif,” Scientific Journal of Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2016, doi: 10.15294/sji.v2i1.4524.
P. Legris, J. Ingham, and P. Collerette, “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information & Management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 191–204, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4.
J. D. Portz et al., “Using the technology acceptance model to explore user experience, intent to use, and use behavior of a patient portal among older adults with multiple chronic conditions: descriptive qualitative study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 21, no. 4, p. e11604, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.2196/11604.
S. M. Sholihah, A. Subiyakto, S. Ratnawati, and M. N. Azizah, “Qualitative evaluation of user acceptance readiness to the implementation of the health center management information system (SIMPUS) at the south tangerang city health center,” Appl. Inf. Syst. Manage., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.15408/aism.v5i1.10589.
R. A. Nugroho and Y. Purbokusumo, “E-government readiness: penilaian kesiapan aktor utama penerapan e-government di indonesia,” Iptek-Kom, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020, doi: 10.17933/iptekkom.22.1.2020.1-17.
I. Ghozali, Structural Equation Modeling, Metode Alternatif Dengan Partial Least Square (PLS). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2014.
W. Abdillah and J. Hartono, Partial Least Square (PLS): Alternatif Structural Modeling (SEM) dalam penelitian bisnis. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta, 2015.
J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v5i2.204
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Applied Data Sciences
| ISSN | : | 2723-6471 (Online) |
| Publisher | : | Bright Publisher |
| Website | : | http://bright-journal.org/JADS |
| : | taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact) | |
| support@bright-journal.org (technical issues) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0