Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasting of Heavy-Tailed Financial Returns via Spiking Neural Networks with Dynamic Adaptive Computation

Rani Farida Sinaga, Sutarman Sutarman, Tulus Tulus, Open Darnius

Abstract


Probabilistic forecasting of financial time series demands models that simultaneously capture heavy-tailed return distributions, time-varying volatility, and structural regime changes. Classical econometric models provide interpretable but rigid parametric specifications, while modern deep forecasting architectures achieve flexibility at the cost of substantial computational overhead. This paper introduces a novel spiking neural network augmented with dynamic adaptive computation for energy-efficient probabilistic sequence modeling. The proposed architecture processes sequential inputs through a leaky integrate-and-fire backbone with learnable, activity-dependent firing thresholds inspired by biological synaptic scaling, outputting the parameters of a Student-t distribution with input-dependent degrees of freedom. The experimental protocol employs a strict chronological train-test split to prevent data leakage. Evaluated across seven synthetic and empirical financial datasets, achieves aggregate calibration comparable to the best-performing fixed-threshold spiking baseline while substantially improving upon the classical and dense neural baselines. Specifically, it shares the lowest Mean Absolute Coverage Error of one point two zero percentage points, with statistical tests confirming significant improvements in coverage and continuous ranked probability score on heavy-tailed assets like Bitcoin. While dense baselines achieve competitive point accuracy, they exhibit severe under-coverage on these assets. In contrast, the proposed approach maintains robust calibration during extreme market regimes, as validated by formal Value-at-Risk backtests supplemented by Expected Shortfall diagnostics. Regime-stratified evaluation demonstrates that the adaptive threshold mechanism prevents the catastrophic over-coverage of classical models during high-volatility crises. Computational analysis indicates that the event-driven architecture maintains sparse spike activity, translating into an estimated ninety-eight point three percent reduction in the analytical software-level energy proxy compared to dense inference baselines. Downstream applications to volatility tracking and unsupervised anomaly detection validate the practical utility of these predictive distributions for real-time risk management, paving the way for resource-efficient models on future neuromorphic hardware.


Keywords


Spiking Neural Networks; Probabilistic Forecasting; Dynamic Adaptive Computation; Heavy-Tailed Distributions; Financial Time Series; Energy Efficiency; Calibration; Anomaly Detection

Full Text:

PDF

References


P. Jorion, Value at Risk: the New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, Third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.

M. Şensoy, L. M. Kaplan, S. Julier, M. Saleki, and F. Cerutti, “Risk-aware classification via uncertainty quantification,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 265, p. 125906, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125906.

M. C. Ruiz-Abellón, L. A. Fernández-Jiménez, A. Guillamón, and A. Gabaldón, “Applications of Probabilistic Forecasting in Demand Response,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 9716, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14219716.

T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, and A. E. Raftery, “Probabilistic Forecasts, Calibration and Sharpness,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 243–268, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00587.x.

T. Bollerslev, “Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 307–327, Apr. 1986, doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1.

R. F. Engle, “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation,” Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 987, Jul. 1982, doi: 10.2307/1912773.

D. B. Nelson, “Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach,” Econometrica, vol. 59, no. 2, p. 347, Mar. 1991, doi: 10.2307/2938260.

L. R. Glosten, R. Jagannathan, and D. E. Runkle, “On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1779–1801, Dec. 1993, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x.

R. F. Engle and G. G. J. Lee, Eds., “A long-run and short-run component model of stock return volatility,” in Cointegration, causality, and forecasting: a festschrift in honour of Clive W.J. Granger, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 475–497. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198296836.001.0001.

R. LePage, “Heavy-Tailed Distributions,” in International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, M. Lovric, Ed., Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2025, pp. 1105–1107. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-69359-9_267.

L. B. Klebanov, Y. V. Kuvaeva-Gudoshnikova, and S. T. Rachev, “Heavy-Tailed Probability Distributions: Some Examples of Their Appearance,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 14, p. 3094, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/math11143094.

D. Salinas, V. Flunkert, J. Gasthaus, and T. Januschowski, “DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 1181–1191, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.001.

B. Lim, S. Ö. Arık, N. Loeff, and T. Pfister, “Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1748–1764, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012.

Y. Santur, “A Novel Financial Forecasting Approach Using Deep Learning Framework,” Comput Econ, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1341–1392, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10614-023-10403-5.

L. Xu and Z. Dong, “Deep learning for financial forecasting and strategic business optimisation in enterprises,” IJICT, vol. 26, no. 19, p. 10071438, 2025, doi: 10.1504/IJICT.2025.10071438.

S. Giantsidi and C. Tarantola, “Deep learning for financial forecasting: A review of recent trends,” International Review of Economics & Finance, vol. 104, p. 104719, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.104719.

G. Huang, “Dynamic neural networks: advantages and challenges,” National Science Review, vol. 11, no. 8, p. nwae088, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae088.

W. Maass, “Networks of spiking neurons: The third generation of neural network models,” Neural Networks, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1659–1671, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(97)00011-7.

M. Davies et al., “Loihi: A Neuromorphic Manycore Processor with On-Chip Learning,” IEEE Micro, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 82–99, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/MM.2018.112130359.

S. K. Esser, R. Appuswamy, P. Merolla, J. V. Arthur, and D. S. Modha, “Backpropagation for energy-efficient neuromorphic computing,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, C. Cortes, N. Lawrence, D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, Eds., Curran Associates, Inc., 2015, pp. 1117–1125. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/file/10a5ab2db37feedfdeaab192ead4ac0e-Paper.pdf

F. Zenke and S. Ganguli, “SuperSpike: Supervised Learning in Multilayer Spiking Neural Networks,” Neural Computation, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1514–1541, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01086.

S. B. Shrestha and G. Orchard, “SLAYER: spike layer error reassignment in time,” in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc., 2018, pp. 1419–1428. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3326943.3327073

P. U. Diehl, D. Neil, J. Binas, M. Cook, S.-C. Liu, and M. Pfeiffer, “Fast-classifying, high-accuracy spiking deep networks through weight and threshold balancing,” in 2015 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Killarney, Ireland: IEEE, Jul. 2015, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280696.

X. Kong et al., “Deep learning for time series forecasting: a survey,” Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber., vol. 16, no. 7–8, pp. 5079–5112, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s13042-025-02560-w.

A. J. Patton and H. Zhang, “Bespoke realized volatility: Tailored measures of risk for volatility prediction,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 254, p. 106122, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2025.106122.

S. Nazlioglu, I. Kucukkaplan, E. Kilic, and M. Altuntas, “Financial market integration of emerging markets: Heavy tails, structural shifts, nonlinearity, and asymmetric persistence,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 62, p. 101742, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101742.

R. M. Neal, “Bayesian learning for neural networks,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://glizen.com/radfordneal/ftp/thesis.pdf

V. Kuleshov, N. Fenner, and S. Ermon, “Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regression,” in Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018, pp. 2796–2804. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/kuleshov18a/kuleshov18a.pdf

F. Ponulak and A. Kasiński, “Supervised Learning in Spiking Neural Networks with ReSuMe: Sequence Learning, Classification, and Spike Shifting,” Neural Computation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 467–510, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1162/neco.2009.11-08-901.

G. G. Turrigiano, “The Self-Tuning Neuron: Synaptic Scaling of Excitatory Synapses,” Cell, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 422–435, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.008.

A. Niculescu-Mizil and R. Caruana, “Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning,” in Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning - ICML ’05, Bonn, Germany: ACM Press, 2005, pp. 625–632. doi: 10.1145/1102351.1102430.

C. Guo, G. Pleiss, Y. Sun, and K. Q. Weinberger, “On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks,” presented at the Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2017, pp. 1320–1330. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1706.04599.

A. P. Dawid, “Present Position and Potential Developments: Some Personal Views: Statistical Theory: The Prequential Approach,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), vol. 147, no. 2, p. 278, 1984, doi: 10.2307/2981683.

J. Bröcker and L. A. Smith, “Scoring Probabilistic Forecasts: The Importance of Being Proper,” Weather and Forecasting, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 382–388, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1175/WAF966.1.

R. A. Fisher, Statistical Methods for Research Workers. in Biological monographs and manuals. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1925. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=I0NBAAAAIAAJ

D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015, pp. 1–15. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1412.6980.

F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.1201.0490.

D. Ladopoulou, D. M. Hong, and P. Dellaportas, “Probabilistic wind power modelling via heteroscedastic non-stationary gaussian processes,” Energy Reports, vol. 15, p. 108895, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.12.032.

M. Horowitz, “1.1 Computing’s energy problem (and what we can do about it),” in 2014 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, USA: IEEE, Feb. 2014, pp. 10–14. doi: 10.1109/ISSCC.2014.6757323.

J. Xu, J. Pan, S. Su, H. Li, R. Zhao, and F. Ding, “Multivariate time series forecasting with a numerical spiking neural P system-inspired network,” Neurocomputing, vol. 700, p. 134476, Nov. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2026.134476.

C. Lu et al., “Accelerating spiking neural networks with photonic reconfigurable devices,” Nat Commun, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 5367, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-72119-y.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i4.1558

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0