A Mixed-Methods Design for Analyzing Telemedicine Adoption: An Information Systems Approach Integrating TAM–ISS, Digital Literacy, and Usability

Fahmi Yusuf, Yulyanto Yulyanto, Rio Priantama

Abstract


This research employs a mixed-methods design to analyze telemedicine adoption in rural Indonesia by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Information System Success Model (ISS), extended with digital literacy and usability. A quantitative survey of 314 respondents was complemented by in-depth interviews with 50 participants and demographic analysis using chi-square and logistic regression. The quantitative findings reveal that the primary adoption construct is Usability → Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) → Perceived Usefulness (PU) → Intention to Use (ITU) → Net Benefit (NB). Perceived usefulness emerged as the strongest predictor of both satisfaction and intention. Information Quality significantly influenced satisfaction, whereas System Quality did not, indicating that clear medical information outweighs technical system performance in shaping satisfaction. Similarly, usability directly did not affect PU but indirectly through PEOU, and digital literacy influenced PU but not PEOU. Demographic analysis confirmed that occupation was significant—students and healthcare workers acted as early adopters—while age and prior training were not, suggesting that adoption transcends generational boundaries due to the widespread penetration of the JKN Mobile platform. Qualitative insights enriched these findings by highlighting key barriers and enablers such as inconsistent interfaces, infrastructure limitations, privacy concerns, community-based socialization, and expectations for adaptive features like AI diagnostics and pharmacy integration. Overall, the research confirms that telemedicine adoption in rural Indonesia is shaped by the synergy of usability, digital literacy, information quality, and social context rather than by training or demographic variables alone.


Keywords


Telemedicine; Digital Literacy; Usability; TAM; ISS; Mixed-Methods; Rural Health Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. A. Naidu, “Telemedicine: Bridging the Gap in Providing Primary Care to Rural Area Patients Across India,” Telehealth and Medicine Today, vol. 9, no. 5, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.30953/thmt.v9.518.

Idoko Benjamin, Joy Ene Idoko, Jennifer Amaka Alakwe, Ogochukwu Judith Ugwu, Fedora Ochanya Idoko, and Victoria Bukky Ayoola, “The role of telemedicine in rural America: Overcoming electrical and technological barriers to improve health outcomes,” International Journal of Science and Research Archive, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 188–205, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.2.1176.

S. K. Kim, S. Y. Park, H. R. Hwang, S. H. Moon, and J. W. Park, “Effectiveness of Mobile Health Intervention in Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” J Med Syst, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 13, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02135-2.

H. K. Y. Almathami, K. T. Win, and E. Vlahu-Gjorgievska, “Barriers and Facilitators That Influence Telemedicine-Based, Real-Time, Online Consultation at Patients’ Homes: Systematic Literature Review,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 2, p. e16407, 2020, doi: 10.2196/16407.

S. A. Anisha, A. Sen, B. Ahmad, and C. Bain, “Exploring Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies for Managing Non-Communicable Diseases Among Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review,” J Med Syst, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 35, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02166-3.

R. K. Gobburi, D. B. Olawade, G. D. Olatunji, E. Kokori, N. Aderinto, and A. C. David-Olawade, “Telemedicine use in rural areas of the United Kingdom to improve access to healthcare facilities: A review of current evidence,” Informatics and Health, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–48, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.infoh.2025.01.003.

Chukwudi Cosmos Maha, Tolulope Olagoke Kolawole, and Samira Abdul, “Revolutionizing community health literacy: The power of digital health tools in rural areas of the US and Africa,” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 286–296, May 2024, doi: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.2.0189.

S. Hosseini Teshnizi, M. H. Hayavi Haghighi, and J. Alipour, “Evaluation of health information systems with ISO 9241-10 standard: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Jan. 01, 2021, Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100639.

F. Schürmann, D. Westmattelmann, and G. Schewe, “Factors Influencing Telemedicine Adoption Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study,” JMIR Form Res, vol. 9, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/54777.

T.-C. Wu and C.-T. Ho, “Reconstructing Risk Dimensions in Telemedicine: Investigating Technology Adoption and Barriers During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 27, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/53306.

T. Cunha Reis, “Artificial intelligence and natural language processing for improved telemedicine: Before, during and after remote consultation,” Aten Primaria, vol. 57, no. 8, p. 103228, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103228.

R. Agudelo, J. A. Pereañez, S. M. C. Muñoz, J. Granados, and M. Ceballos, “e-Health applications for outpatient professional pharmaceutical care services: A scoping review,” Mar. 01, 2025, Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100567.

F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Manage Sci, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, Aug. 1989, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.

H. Jo and Y. Bang, “Understanding continuance intention of enterprise resource planning (ERP): TOE, TAM, and IS success model,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21019.

W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 9–30, 2003, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748.

B. Chimbo and L. Motsi, “The Effects of Electronic Health Records on Medical Error Reduction: Extension of the DeLone and McLean Information System Success Model,” JMIR Med Inform, vol. 12, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/54572.

D. Gefen, E. Karahanna, and D. W. Straub, “Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust,” IEEE Trans Eng Manag, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 307–321, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1109/TEM.2003.817277.

V. Venkatesh and H. Bala, “Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions,” Decision Sciences, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–315, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x.

E. M. Rogers, A. Singhal, and M. M. Quinlan, “Diffusion of innovations,” in An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Third Edition, Taylor and Francis, 2019, pp. 415–433. doi: 10.4324/9780203710753-35.

A. Rahman, Y. Hermawan, and S. H. Sartika, “The Effect of Task Technology Fit in Google Classroom Media on Learning Achievement in Higher Education: Goodhue and Thompson’s Theory,” vol. 21, no. 02, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.uns.ac.id/Teknodika

S. Ulfa, E. Surahman, I. Fatawi, and H. Tsukasa, “Task-Technology Fit Analysis: Measuring the Factors that influence Behavioural Intention to Use the Online Summary-with Automated Feedback in a MOOCs Platform,” 2024. [Online]. Available: www.ejel.org

J. W. Creswell and J. David Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018.

Joseph F. Hair Jr et al., “Classroom Companion: Business Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R AAWorkbook,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.

F. Yusuf, “Information Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model for Social Media Adoption in Blended Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education Institutions in West Java, Indonesia,” Journal of Applied Data Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 382–402, May 2024, doi: 10.47738/jads.v5i2.195.

S. Petter, W. DeLone, and E. McLean, “Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 236–263, 2008, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.15.

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies,” Manage Sci, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

S. C. Viontita and E. R. Mahendrawathi, “Evaluation of Surabaya population administration & civil registration systems using DeLone & McLean information system success model,” in Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier B.V., 2024, pp. 1154–1163. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.111.

J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks, and S. Ray, Classroom Companion: Business Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i1.1084

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0