UAV Imagery-Based Potential Forest Fire Detection Using YOLOv10

Jasman Pardede, Muhamad Rifki Pratama, Rizka Milandga Milenio

Abstract


Forest fire mitigation requires an early detection system that is both fast and reliable. This study presents a real-time potential forest fire detection system based on UAV imagery using the YOLOv10 object detection model. The main objective is to enhance the accuracy of detecting fire and smoke in aerial imagery and to minimize false alarms through hyperparameter optimization and data balancing strategies. The dataset used was compiled from Roboflow Universe and Kaggle, consisting of two object classes: fire and smoke, with a slight class imbalance (1329 fire and 1024 smoke). In total, 1,691 annotated images were used, covering various lighting conditions, smoke densities, camera angles, and geographic backgrounds, and were divided into training, validation, and test sets with a ratio of approximately 75:15:10. To address the class imbalance and visual variability, data augmentation techniques such as rotation, flipping, brightness adjustment, and noise addition were applied, along with loss weighting to improve learning performance for the minority smoke class. Model training was conducted using 24 hyperparameter configurations combining six optimizers, two batch sizes, and two learning rates. The best hyperparameters are NAdam optimizer, batch_size 24, and learning_rate 0.001.The best performance of accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, mean IoU, and mAP were achieved at 0.879, 0.8705, 0.8575, 0.863, 0.7373, and 0.870, respectively. Real-time testing using a DJI Mini 4 Pro UAV with RTMP livestream input demonstrated stable and responsive detection, displaying bounding boxes, class labels, confidence scores, and a “POTENTIAL FOREST FIRE” indicator when both fire and smoke were detected simultaneously. These findings confirm that integrating UAV and YOLOv10 technologies provides an effective and adaptive approach for real-time early detection of potential forest fires.


Keywords


YOLOv10; Object Detection; Potential Forest Fire; UAV; Aerial Imagery; Real-Time Detection; Hyperparameter

Full Text:

PDF

References


Z. Jiao et al., “A Deep Learning Based Forest Fire Detection Approach Using UAV and YOLOv3,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIAI.2019.8850815.

Z. Lin, B. Yun, and Y. Zheng, “LD-YOLO: A Lightweight Dynamic Forest Fire and Smoke Detection Model with Dysample and Spatial Context Awareness Module,” Forests, vol. 15, no. 9, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091630.

N. Korolyova et al., “The Last Trees Standing: Climate modulates tree survival factors during a prolonged bark beetle outbreak in Europe,” Agric For Meteorol, vol. 322, Jul. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109025.

S. L. Stephens et al., “Drought, Tree Mortality, and Wildfire in Forests Adapted to Frequent Fire,” Feb. 01, 2018, Oxford University Press. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix146.

Z. Jiao et al., A YOLOv3-based Learning Strategy for Real-time UAV-based Forest Fire Detection. IEEE, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC49329.2020.9163816.

Mr. S. Goyal, Mr. M. Shagill, Ms. A. Dhillon, Dr. H. Vohra, and Dr. A. Singh, “A YOLO based Technique for Early Forest Fire Detection,” International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1357–1362, Apr. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.F4106.049620.

J. J. Rose et al., “Carbon monoxide poisoning: Pathogenesis, management, and future directions of therapy,” Mar. 01, 2017, American Thoracic Society. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201606-1275CI.

V. M. Becerra, “Autonomous control of unmanned aerial vehicles,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 4, Apr. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8040452.

Y. Chen et al., UAV Image-based Forest Fire Detection Approach Using Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2019.8833958.

M. Yandouzi et al., “Investigation of Combining Deep Learning Object Recognition with Drones for Forest Fire Detection and Monitoring,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140342.

P. Li and W. Zhao, “Image fire detection algorithms based on convolutional neural networks,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 19, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2020.100625.

X. Zheng, F. Chen, L. Lou, P. Cheng, and Y. Huang, “Real-Time Detection of Full-Scale Forest Fire Smoke Based on Deep Convolution Neural Network,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 14, no. 3, Feb. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030536.

A. Wang et al., “YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection,” May 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.14458.

M. Mao, A. Lee, and M. Hong, “Efficient Fabric Classification and Object Detection Using YOLOv10,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 19, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13193840.

A. S. Geetha, M. A. R. Alif, M. Hussain, and P. Allen, “Comparative Analysis of YOLOv8 and YOLOv10 in Vehicle Detection: Performance Metrics and Model Efficacy,” Vehicles, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1364–1382, Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles6030065.

F. Agarwal, I. Chakraborty, S. Banerjee, and A. P. J. Abdul, “Impact of Forest Fire on Climate Change,” International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM), vol. 6, p. 391, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0601391398.

S. Urbanski, “Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Emission factors,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 317, pp. 51–60, Apr. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.045.

S. Sannigrahi et al., “Examining the effects of forest fire on terrestrial carbon emission and ecosystem production in India using remote sensing approaches,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 725, Jul. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138331.

F. Tedim et al., “Defining extreme wildfire events: Difficulties, challenges, and impacts,” Fire, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–28, Jun. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/fire1010009.

G. Huidobro, L. Giessen, and S. L. Burns, “And it burns, burns, burns, the ring-of-fire: Reviewing and harmonizing terminology on wildfire management and policy,” Jul. 01, 2024, Elsevier Ltd. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103776.

S. A. H. Mohsan, M. A. Khan, F. Noor, I. Ullah, and M. H. Alsharif, “Towards the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Comprehensive Review,” Jun. 01, 2022, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6060147.

Q. Song, Y. Zeng, J. Xu, and S. Jin, “A survey of prototype and experiment for UAV communications,” Apr. 01, 2021, Science in China Press. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3030-2.

S. H. Alsamhi et al., “UAV Computing-Assisted Search and Rescue Mission Framework for Disaster and Harsh Environment Mitigation,” Drones, vol. 6, no. 7, Jul. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6070154.

J. Cai, H. Zhang, A. Khadakar, A. Mohammadzadeh, and C. Zhang, “Automatic control of UAVs: new adaptive rules and type-3 fuzzy stabilizer,” Complex and Intelligent Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 7235–7248, Oct. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01434-y.

P. Liu et al., “A review of rotorcraft unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) developments and applications in civil engineering,” Jun. 01, 2014, Techno Press. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.1065.

E. Dritsas and M. Trigka, “Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis in the Big Data Era: A Survey,” Feb. 01, 2025, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030550.

P. Radoglou-Grammatikis, P. Sarigiannidis, T. Lagkas, and I. Moscholios, “A compilation of UAV applications for precision agriculture,” Computer Networks, vol. 172, May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107148.

S. Sathyanarayanan and B. R. Tantri, “Confusion Matrix-Based Performance Evaluation Metrics,” African Journal of Biomedical Research, pp. 4023–4031, Nov. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.4345.

H. Rezatofighi, N. Tsoi, J. Gwak, A. Sadeghian, I. Reid, and S. Savarese, “Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regression,” Feb. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.09630.

J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi, “You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection,” Jun. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.02640.

R. Padilla, S. L. Netto, and E. A. B. Da Silva, “A Survey on Performance Metrics for Object-Detection Algorithms,” Jul. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSIP48289.2020.

I. El-Madafri, M. Peña, and N. Olmedo-Torre, “The Wildfire Dataset: Enhancing Deep Learning-Based Forest Fire Detection with a Diverse Evolving Open-Source Dataset Focused on Data Representativeness and a Novel Multi-Task Learning Approach,” Forests, vol. 14, no. 9, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091697.

A. Shamsoshoara, F. Afghah, A. Razi, L. Zheng, P. Z. Fulé, and E. Blasch, “Aerial imagery pile burn detection using deep learning: The FLAME dataset,” Computer Networks, vol. 193, Jul. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108001.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i1.1052

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0