SAGOMECON: An Adaptive ε-Constraint-Based Optimization Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Collaborative Industrial Networks

M Mesran, Poltak Sihombing, Syahril Efendi, Muhammad Zarlis

Abstract


In collaborative industrial networks, decision-making processes often involve conflicting objectives such as minimizing operational costs and risks, while simultaneously maximizing efficiency and inter-organizational collaboration. Existing multi-objective optimization methods, including the ε-constraint and its variants, face significant challenges in handling dynamic constraints and achieving computational efficiency in real-world scenarios. To address these limitations, this study introduces SAGOMECON (Simplified Adaptive Optimization with Modified ε-Constraint), an enhanced optimization approach designed to support adaptive and efficient multi-criteria decision-making in dynamic environments. SAGOMECON extends the conventional SAUGMECON framework by incorporating real-time constraint updates, adaptive slack handling, and iterative refinement mechanisms, enabling it to maintain solution feasibility under shifting priorities and evolving operational conditions. The proposed method was evaluated using simulated datasets representing partner selection scenarios in collaborative networked organizations (CNOs). Comparative analysis against the traditional ε-constraint and SAUGMECON methods demonstrates that SAGOMECON consistently delivers Pareto-optimal solutions with reduced computational time and superior adaptability to dynamic changes. The findings suggest that SAGOMECON offers a practical and scalable solution for decision-makers in collaborative industrial settings, particularly where trade-offs between competing objectives must be navigated under uncertainty. This contribution is significant for industries seeking intelligent optimization strategies that align with agile and data-driven decision-making frameworks.

Full Text:

PDF

References


L. M. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, N. Galeano, and A. Molina, “Collaborative networked organizations – Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 46–60, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.11.024.

H. Wang and B. Ran, “Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements,” Public Management Review, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1187–1211, 2023, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389.

N. H. F. Beebe, A Bibliography of Publications in The International Journal of Quantum Chemistry: 1980–1989. ctan.math.utah.edu, 2023.

J. A. Hernandez-Almazan, R. Chalmeta, R. V. Roque-Hernández, and R. Machucho-Cadena, “A Framework to Build a Big Data Ecosystem Oriented to the Collaborative Networked Organization,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 22, p. 11494, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app122211494.

M. M. Yassa, H. A. Hassan, and F. A. Omara, “New Federated Collaborative Networked Organization Model (FCNOM),” International Journal of Cloud Computing and Services Science (IJ-CLOSER), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2012, doi: 10.11591/closer.v1i1.131.

J. Yang and A. Palazzolo, “Power loss reduction for tilt pad journal bearings utilizing pad pockets and steps,” Tribology International, vol. 159, no. 7, p. 106993, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.106993.

P. K. Bättig, P. H. Wagner, and Jürg A. Schiffmann, “Experimental Investigation of Enhanced Grooves for Herringbone Grooved Journal Bearings,” J. Tribol., vol. 14, no. 9, p. 091801, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053978.

Y. Gu, D. Wang, L. Cheng, Artur Schimpf, and M. Böhle, “A novel method to achieve fast multi-objective optimization of hydrostatic porous journal bearings used in hydraulic turbomachine,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 145, no. 5, p. 051205, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4057003.

E. Guenat and J. Schiffmann, “Multi-objective optimization of grooved gas journal bearings for robustness in manufacturing tolerances,” Tribology Transactions, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1041–1050, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10402004.2019.1642547.

X. Zhou, Y. Sun, Z. Huang, C. Yang, and G. G. Yen, “Dynamic multi-objective optimization and fuzzy AHP for copper removal process of zinc hydrometallurgy,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 129, no. 11, p. 109613, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109613.

B. Pérez-Cañedo, J. L. Verdegay, and E. R. Concepción-Morales, “An ϵ -Constraint Method for Multiobjective Linear Programming in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 9677396, 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/9677396.

A. Maneengam, “Multi-Objective Optimization of the Multimodal Routing Problem Using the Adaptive ε-Constraint Method and Modified TOPSIS with the D-CRITIC Method,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 15, p. 12066, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151512066.

H. Taherdoost and M. Madanchian, “Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts,” Encyclopedia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2023, doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia3010006.

J. Zhang, L. Lu, Z. Zheng, H. Tong, and X. Huang, “Experimental verification: a multi-objective optimization method for inversion technology of hydrodynamic journal bearings,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 10–25, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00158-022-03470-z.

N. Gunantara, “A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications,” Cogent Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi: 10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242.

K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002, doi: 10.1109/4235.996017.

W. Zhang and M. Reimann, “A simple augmented ∊-constraint method for multi-objective mathematical integer programming problems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.001.

T. Daengsi, M. Rungruangthum, P. Pornpongtechavanich, and Pongpisit Wuttidittachotti, “Decision Making Using Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Preliminary Study of Scientific Journal Selection for Publication,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD), ieeexplore.ieee.org, 2022, pp. 1–10. doi: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10041870.

M. Sohrabi, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, and V. A. Gromov, “Genetic Engineering Algorithm (GEA): An Efficient Metaheuristic Algorithm for Solving Combinatorial Optimization Problems,” Automation and Remote Control, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 252–262, 2024, doi: 10.1134/S000511792403007X.

G. Gui, H. Pan, Z. Lin, Y. Li, and Z. Yuan, “Data-driven support vector machine with optimization techniques for structural health monitoring and damage detection,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 523–534, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s12205-017-1518-5.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i4.941

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0