Spatio-Temporal Variation in Bus Service Satisfaction and Policy Implications: A Case-Based Study in an Emerging Urban Area

Nguyen Thi Ngoc Nga, Hai Nguyen Minh

Abstract


This study investigates the spatio-temporal variation in bus service satisfaction in a rapidly urbanizing city in Southeast Asia. The research addresses a critical gap in urban transit studies, where passenger satisfaction is often treated as a static construct, overlooking how satisfaction may fluctuate across different geographic areas and time periods. By applying a spatio-temporal analytical framework, this study aims to provide a more dynamic and localized understanding of transit service perceptions. The research builds upon existing approaches by integrating a structured survey based on the Customer Satisfaction Survey (CSS) method with Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) to prioritize service attributes. A stratified sampling technique was employed across multiple wards in the study area, with 612 valid responses collected during both peak and off-peak hours. The survey captured data on passenger experiences and preferences, disaggregated by time of day, location, and demographic characteristics. Multinomial Logit (MNL) modeling was used to estimate the relative importance of key service dimensions, such as punctuality, comfort, frequency, and accessibility. The analysis revealed significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity in satisfaction levels. For instance, passengers in peripheral wards rated reliability and onboard conditions more negatively compared to those in central areas. Similarly, satisfaction levels were lower during evening hours, particularly concerning bus overcrowding and wait times. The findings suggest that transit policy must adopt a more flexible and localized strategy, rather than uniform service standards, to address distinct user expectations. Targeted improvements in underperforming routes and time slots could enhance overall user experience and promote public transport usage. This study contributes new insights to the evaluation of urban bus services in emerging cities and underscores the value of incorporating spatio-temporal dynamics into transit planning and customer satisfaction research.

Keywords


Passenger Experience; Perceived Transit Quality; Urban Bus Systems; Best-Worst Analysis; Spatial and Temporal Dynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. Beaudoin, Y. H. Farzin, and C.-Y. C. L. Lawell, “Public transit investment and sustainable transportation: A review of studies of transit’s impact on traffic congestion and air quality,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 52, pp. 15–22, 2015.

K. Manaugh and A. El-Geneidy, “Who benefi ts from new transportation infrastructure? Using accessibility measures to evaluate social equity in public transport provision,” in Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning: Challenges for Europe and North America, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012, pp. 211–227. doi: 10.4337/9781781000113.00021.

J. De Oña and R. De Oña, “Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches,” Transportation Science, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 605–622, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0544.

O. Cats, R. F. Abenoza, C. Liu, and Y. O. Susilo, “Evolution of satisfaction with public transport and its determinants in Sweden identifying priority areas,” Transp Res Rec, vol. 2538, pp. 86–96, 2015, doi: 10.3141/2538-10.

M. Börjesson and I. Rubensson, “Satisfaction with crowding and other attributes in public transport,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 79, pp. 213–222, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010.

R. Cordera, S. Nogués, E. González-González, and L. dell’Olio, “Intra-urban spatial disparities in user satisfaction with public transport services,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 20, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11205829.

R. Borck, “Public transport and urban pollution,” Reg Sci Urban Econ, vol. 77, pp. 356–366, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.06.005.

N. Gendron-Carrier, M. Gonzalez-Navarro, S. Polloni, and M. A. Turner, “Subways and Urban Air Pollution,” Am Econ J Appl Econ, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 164–196, 2022, doi: 10.1257/app.20180168.

D. Q. Nguyen-Phuoc, W. Young, G. Currie, and C. De Gruyter, “Traffic congestion relief associated with public transport: state-of-the-art,” Public Transport, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 455–481, 2020.

N. Foth, K. Manaugh, and A. M. El-Geneidy, “Towards equitable transit: Examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996-2006,” J Transp Geogr, vol. 29, pp. 1–10, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.008.

N. Cuthill, M. Cao, Y. Liu, X. Gao, and Y. Zhang, “The association between Urban Public Transport infrastructure and social equity and spatial accessibility within the urban environment: An investigation of Tramlink in London,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 5, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11051229.

J. De Oña and R. De Oña, “Quality of service in public transport based on customer satisfaction surveys: A review and assessment of methodological approaches,” Transportation Science, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 605–622, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0544.

W. T. Lai and C. F. Chen, “Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers-The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 318–325, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.003.

P. P. Transport, “Service Quality Definition, Targeting and Measurement,” 2002, European Committee for Standardization.

L. Eboli and G. Mazzulla, “A stated preference experiment for measuring service quality in public transport,” Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 509–523, 2008, doi: 10.1080/03081060802364471.

R. Cordera, S. Nogués, E. González-González, and L. Dell’Olio, “Intra-urban spatial disparities in user satisfaction with public transport services,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 20, p. 5829, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11205829.

J. Allen, J. C. Muñoz, and J. de Dios Ortúzar, “On the effect of operational service attributes on transit satisfaction,” Transportation (Amst), vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 2307–2336, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11116-019-10016-8.

O. Cats, R. F. Abenoza, C. Liu, and Y. O. Susilo, “Evolution of satisfaction with public transport and its determinants in Sweden identifying priority areas,” Transp Res Rec, vol. 2538, pp. 86–96, 2015, doi: 10.3141/2538-10.

M. Börjesson and I. Rubensson, “Satisfaction with crowding and other attributes in public transport,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 79, pp. 213–222, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.010.

J. J. Louviere, T. N. Flynn, and A. A. J. Marley, Best-worst scaling: Theory, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

L. dell’Olio, A. Ibeas, and P. Cecin, “The quality of service desired by public transport users,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 217–227, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.005.

L. Eboli, C. Forciniti, and G. Mazzulla, “Spatial variation of the perceived transit service quality at rail stations,” Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 114, pp. 67–83, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.032.

J. de Oña, “Understanding the mediator role of satisfaction in public transport: A cross-country analysis,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 100, pp. 129–149, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.09.011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i4.879

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0