Traditional-Enhance-Mobile-Ubiquitous-Smart: Model Innovation in Higher Education Learning Style Classification Using Multidimensional and Machine Learning Methods

Irfan Santiko, Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowati, Bayu Surarso, Imam Tahyudin, Zainal Arifin Hasibuan, Ahmad Naim Che Pee
Pages 753-772
Abstract Views 594
PDF Downloads 440
Crossref Citations -
DOI https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i1.598

Abstract


Learning achievement is undoubtedly impacted by each person's unique learning style. The assessment pattern is less focused due to the intricacy of the current components. In fact, general elements like VARK are thought to create complexity that can impair focus when combined with elements like environmental conditions, teacher effectiveness, and stakeholder policies. Although it is only ideal in specific areas, the application of supported information technology has so far yielded positive results. This essay attempts to be creative in evaluating how well students learn in higher education settings. An assessment framework that uses multidimensionality and simplifies features is the innovation that is being offered. Method, Material, and Media (3M) are the three categories into which simplification of aspects is separated. However, the Dimensions are categorized into five groups: Traditional, Enhance, Mobile, Ubiquitous, and Smart (TEMUS). Approximately 1200 respondents consisting of students and lecturers formed into a dataset in 2 types of data, namely test data and training data. The trial was conducted using 4 models, namely Random Forest, SVM, Decision Tree, and K-Nearest. The test results were interpreted in MSE, R-Square, Accuracy, Recall, Precision, and F1-Score. Based on the comparison of test results, it states that Random Forest has the most optimal results with MSE values of 0.46, R Square 0.99, Accuracy 0.86, Recall 0.86, Precision 0.87, F1 Score 0.84. Based on the results obtained, it proves that in addition to being able to carry out the classification process, the TEMUS Dimensional Framework can form a pattern of compatibility with each other, between the learning styles of Lecturers and Students. According to this TEMUS framework, teacher and student performance will be deemed suitable and effective when the 3M components are assessed from both perspectives in the same way. If not, a review will be conducted.

Keywords


Innovation; Learning Style; Multidimensional; Classification; Machine Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Abu-Al-Aish and S. Love, “Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 82–107, 2013, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1631.

Y. A. Adenle, E. H. W. Chan, Y. Sun, and C. K. Chau, “Exploring the coverage of environmental-dimension indicators in existing campus sustainability appraisal tools,” Environ. Sustain. Indic., vol. 8, no. June, p. 100057, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.indic.2020.100057.

A. Hassanzadeh, F. Kanaani, and S. Elahi, “A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 10959–10966, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028.

F. Aburub and I. Alnawas, “A new integrated model to explore factors that influence adoption of mobile learning in higher education: An empirical investigation,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2145–2158, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09862-x.

S. Iglesias-Pradas, Á. Hernández-García, J. Chaparro-Peláez, and J. L. Prieto, “Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 119, no. January, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713.

D.-C. Chen, B.-Y. Lai, and C.-P. Chen, “Stimulating the Influence of Teaching Effectiveness and Students’ Learning Motivation by Using the Hierarchical Linear Model,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 15, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14159191.

J. Li and Z. Zhou, “Matching Teaching Content and Strategy of Practical Document Writing and Processing Courses Based on Wisdom Education,” Mob. Inf. Syst., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/4282141.

M. E. Cho, J. H. Lee, and M. J. Kim, “Identifying online learning experience of architecture students for a smart education environment,” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1903 – 1914, 2023, doi: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2145216.

S. Ozkan and R. Koseler, “Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation,” Comput. Educ., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1285–1296, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011.

I. Santiko, T. R. Soeprobowati, and B. Surarso, “Model review on the proposed new smart campus framework in achieving industry 4.0,” Proc. - 2021 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Inf. Syst. Electr. Eng. Appl. Data Sci. Artif. Intell. Technol. Glob. Challenges Dur. Pandemic Era, ICITISEE 2021, pp. 288–293, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICITISEE53823.2021.9655813.

Z. Barnett‐Itzhaki, D. Beimel, and A. Tsoury, “Using a Variety of Interactive Learning Methods to Improve Learning Effectiveness: Insights from AI Models Based on Teaching Surveys,” Online Learn., 2023, doi: 10.24059/olj.v27i3.3575.

R. Luo and Y. Zhou, “The effectiveness of self‐regulated learning strategies in higher education blended learning: A five years systematic review,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.13052.

J. C. Désiron, M.-L. Schmitz, and D. Petko, “Teachers as Creators of Digital Multimedia Learning Materials: Are they Aligned with Multimedia Learning Principles,” Technol. Knowledge, Learn., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10758-024-09770-1.

F. A. Mohd Rahim, N. Zainon, N. M. Aziz, L. S. Chuing, and U. H. Obaidellah, “a Review on Smart Campus Concept and Application Towards Enhancing Campus Users’ Learning Experiences,” Int. J. Prop. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.22452/ijps.vol11no1.1.

A. Rahmah, H. B. Santoso, and Z. A. Hasibuan, “Critical Review of Technology-Enhanced Learning using Automatic Content Analysis Case Study of TEL Maturity Assessment Formulation,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., no. January, 2022, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130148.

F. Ouyang, M. Wu, L. Zheng, L. Zhang, and P. Jiao, “Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4.

A. A. Alfalah, “Factors influencing students’ adoption and use of mobile learning management systems (m-LMSs): A quantitative study of Saudi Arabia,” Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 3, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100143.

L. Yi, W. Shunbo, and L. Yangfan, “The study of virtual reality adaptive learning method based on learning style model,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., 2021, doi: 10.1002/CAE.22462.

A. Tatnall, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1.

I. Santiko, T. R. Soeprobowati, and B. Surarso, Kampus Pintar Prospek Pendidikan Masa Depan, 1st ed. Semarang: Undip Press, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://penerbit.undip.ac.id/index.php/penerbit/catalog/book/722

G. Lampropoulos and A. Sidiropoulos, “Impact of Gamification on Students’ Learning Outcomes and Academic Performance: A Longitudinal Study Comparing Online, Traditional, and Gamified Learning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 367, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14040367.

S. Seo, D. Van Orman, M. Beattie, L. Paxson, and J. Murray, “Breaking down the silos: Student experience of transformative learning through interdisciplinary project-based learning (IPBL),” J. Hosp. Leis. Sport & Tour. Educ., vol. 32, p. 100440, 2023.

J. Jeon, S. Lee, and S. Choi, “A systematic review of research on speech-recognition chatbots for language learning: Implications for future directions in the era of large language models,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 4613–4631, 2024.

I. Santiko, T. R. Soeprobowati, and B. Surarso, “Experiments to Review Literature on Topic Trends in Technology Development in Educational Information Systems,” pp. 94–99, 2024, doi: 10.1109/icitisee58992.2023.10404276.

Y. P. Jiao, P. Liu, and P. Q. Qi, “Quality Evaluation Method for Settlement Data Matching Based on Grey Correlation Analysis,” J. Phys., 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2181/1/012034.

H. Shimodaira, “Cross-validation of matching correlation analysis by resampling matching weights,” arXiv: Machine Learning. 2015.

O. N. Cecilia, B. U. Cornelius-Ukpepi, E. A. Edoho, and E. O. Richard, “The influence of learning styles on academic performance among science education undergraduates at the University of Calabar,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 14, no. 17, pp. 618–624, 2019, doi: 10.5897/err2019.3806.

A. Rashad Sayed, M. Helmy Khafagy, M. Ali, and M. Hussien Mohamed, “Predict student learning styles and suitable assessment methods using click stream,” Egypt. Informatics J., vol. 26, no. April, p. 100469, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eij.2024.100469.

L. Melzner and C. Kappes, “Testing the meshing hypothesis in prospective teachers: Are there effects of matching learning style and presentation mode on learning performance and on metacognitive aspects of learning?,” Instr. Sci., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11251-024-09689-1.

D. Caldwell, C. Johnson, M. Moore, A. Moore, M. Poush, and A. M. Franks, “Teaching Through the Student Lens: Qualitative Exploration of Student Evaluations of Teaching,” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, p. 100672, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100672.

R. A. Ellis, “Strategic directions in the what and how of learning and teaching innovation a fifty year synopsis,” High. Educ., vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1267–1281, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00945-2.

B. Ahmad Muhammad, C. Qi, Z. Wu, and H. Kabir Ahmad, “GRL-LS: A learning style detection in online education using graph representation learning,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 201, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117138.

Y. P. Valencia Usme, M. Normann, I. Sapsai, J. Abke, A. Madsen, and G. Weidl, “Learning Style Classification by Using Bayesian Networks Based on the Index of Learning Style,” in Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Software Engineering Education, in ECSEE ’23. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023, pp. 73–82. doi: 10.1145/3593663.3593685.

R. Yuvaraj et al., “A Machine Learning Framework for Classroom EEG Recording Classification: Unveiling Learning-Style Patterns,” Algorithms, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1–19, 2024, doi: 10.3390/a17110503.

A. Ezzaim, A. Dahbi, A. Aqqal, and A. Haidine, AI-based learning style detection in adaptive learning systems: a systematic literature review, no. 0123456789. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s40692-024-00328-9.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i1.598

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0