The Impact of Industrial Security Risk Management on Decision-Making in SMEs: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach
Abstract
This study focuses on the importance of industrial risk management for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Algeria, particularly given the administrative, economic, and financial challenges they face, as well as their limited experience in this field. Risk management serves as a strategic tool that aids institutions in achieving safety and sustainability by identifying potential risks that may lead to industrial disasters, such as chemical incidents and technical malfunctions, then analyzing, assessing, and responding to these risks in ways that minimize their impact on the safety of individuals, property, and the environment. The study aims to analyze the impact of risk management on SMEs' ability to make accurate and timely decisions during critical moments while fostering a culture of safety and proactive risk handling. To achieve these objectives, a survey was conducted on a sample of 390 Algerian industrial SMEs. The study employed the Confirmatory Factor Analysis methodology (CB-SEM) to analyze data from these SMEs, which helped in identifying core risk management processes such as risk description, analysis, and conclusion, and evaluating their effectiveness in supporting decision-making. The findings indicate that the impact of the risk description process on decision-making is positive but weak at 14.7%, while the impact of the risk analysis process on decision-making is also positive and weak at 18.9%. However, the effect of the risk conclusion process on decision-making was positive and moderate, at 64.8%. The results further reveal that SMEs that adopt a comprehensive and sustainable approach to risk management have a greater ability to manage disasters and ensure operational safety. The study highlights the importance of regularly reviewing safety protocols, providing training and simulations for employees, improving risk response strategies, and enhancing organizational performance. However, it was observed that some SMEs lack reliance on modern systems for risk avoidance. The study recommends the importance of allocating an independent budget to address potential risks, activating proactive systems for risk prediction, and employing internal and external experts for risk analysis. The study recommends that SMEs focus on developing mechanisms for describing and analyzing risks and collaborating with specialized entities to implement modern systems that support safety and sustainability. Additionally, it advises organizations to raise employees' awareness and provide training on risk handling to enhance the effectiveness of risk management and ensure business continuity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Accastello, c., & et al. (2021). The concept of risk and natural hazards. Chapter, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.99503.
Algerie presse service. (2023, februrary 18). https://www.aps.dz/ar/economie/139660-3-1.
Asikhia, O., & al, e. (2019). technological intelligence and organizational performance: moderating role of process innovation. open journal of economics and commerce, vol 2(No1).
Asikhia, o., & et al. (2021). effective management desicion making and organizational excellence: a theoretical review,. The international journal of business, doi:10.24940/theijbm/2021/v9/i1/BM2101-49.
Aven, t. (2015). Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advance on their foundation. european journal of operational research, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.
Baltag, c.-d., & Morariu, c. (2022). Quality and risk management in industrial production systems: A literature review. Buletinul institutului polithenic din iasi, doi: 10.247/bipcm-2022-0026, vol 68(nu 3).
Bhoola, V., & et al. (2014). An assessment of risk response strategies practiced in software projects. Australasian journal of information systems, vol 18(no 3).
Boghean, f. (2020). Integrating risk management into desicion making. The 16 economic international conference new challenges and opportunities for the economy 40 may 7-8 th. romania.
Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, r. (2011). Determinants of decision-making in risky situations. Int.statistical Inst: Proc.58 the world statistical congress.
Budiharjo, M., & et al. (2019). Application of risk identification, risk analysis, and risk assessment in the university laboratory. IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/598/1/012069.
Chand, A., & et al. (2021). Risk management: challenges and opportunities. technical rapport.
Dibekulu, D. (2020). An Overview of data analysis and interpretation in research. academicresearch journal, doi: 10.14662/IJARER2020.015.
Elena Bitan, G., & et al. (2020). Possibilities to improve risk management in the context of implementing a quality management systerm. The 3 rd international conference on economics and social science, doi: 10.2478/9788366675162-022.
gede nyoman, m., & et al. (2019). CB-SEM and VB-SEM: evaluating masurement model of business strategy oif internet industry in indonesia. international journal of scientific AND engineering research, vol 10(isssue 10).
ghasemi, f., & et al. (2018). project portfolio risk identification and analysis, considering project risk interactions and using bayesian networks. sustainability, doi:10.3390/su10051609.
gonzalez-gaya, c., & er al. (2021). an approach to sustanability risk assessment in industrial assets. sustainability, doi:10.3390/su131265538.
Hair, J. (2016). Aprimer on partial least square structural equattion modelling (PLS-SEM).
Hakimah, h., & Rabibah, M. (2021). Risk management processes developed for business. Asia E-conference on business, education, social sciences and technoilogy.
Hamid, T. (2018). The role of competitive intelligence and its sub-types on achieving market performance. Cogent business & management, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1540073.
Hataminezhad, M., & all, e. (2020). The role of organizational capabilities in reducing technological risks and improving the market performance of knowledge companies by mediating role of technology intelligence.
Hendar, H., & all, e. (2020). Market intelligence on business performance: the mediating role of specialized marketing capabilities. journal of intellience studies in business, Vol 10(No1).
johanna beerens, r., & et al. (2020). How can we make disaster management evaluation more useful? an empirical study of dutch exercice evaluation. Int J disaster risk sci, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00286.
kaya akarkamçi, H., & et al. (2014). Diaster management and diaster preparedness: examples of practice in california and turkey.
khanthavudh, c., & et al. (2024). Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in asia: an integrate review. international journal of nursing studies, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591.
Kitsios, f., & et al. (2022). Developing a risk analysis strategy framework for impact assessment in information security management systems: a case study in IT consulting industry. sustainability, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031269.
Kuznetsova, M. (2019). The risk management of sustainability industrial organizations. Vestnik universiteta, doi:10.26425/1816-4277-2019-6-105-114.
Lande , G., & Mohtire, A. (2021). Risk management : process and response. Vidyabharati international interdisciplinary research journal, vol 12(no 2).
loendorf, w. (2010). Engineering management performance monitoring methods utilized by manufactures to become more competitive. american society for engineering education.
Lu, J., & et al. (2012). Risk management in desicion making. intelligent systems reference library, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25755-1_1.
Makkawi, H. (2021). the role of risk management in increasing business performance. science, doi: 10.2478/piche-2021-0099.
Maljugic, b., & et al. (2022). Risk analysis and risk management business practice. International symposium engineering management and competitiveness.
Mekimah, s. (2020). The phases of covid-19 crisis management by the directorates of commerce in algeria and its effect on the consumer behavior. review of economic and business studies, doi: 10.47743/rebs-2020-2-0001, vol 13(2).
Mian niman raheem, M. (2021). The effect of risk and uncertainty factors on managerial decision making. journal of education and vocational research, vol 12(no 1).
Miroslav, z., & et al. (2023). risk management in manufacturing practice using the point metho. sciendo; doi: 10.2478/czoto-2023-0035, vol 5(issue 1).
Misra, K.B. (2008). Risk Analysis and Management: An Introduction. In: Misra, K.B. (eds) Handbook of Performability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_41.
Mohammadi, s., & et al. (2024). Review article: current approaches and critical issues in multi-risk recovery planning of urban areas exposed to natural hazards. Natural hazards and earth system sciences, doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-79-2024.
Myskova, r., & Doupalova, v. (2015). Approach to risk management desicion-making in the small business. procedia economics andfinance, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01637-8.
negulescu, o., & doval, e. (2014). The quality of desicion making process related to organizations effectiveness. procedia economics and finance, doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(14) oo548-6.
Nehari talet, a., & et al. (2018). Risk monitoring through better knowledge-based risk processes. the journal of operational risk, doi: 10.21314/jop.2018.210.
Nirupama, N. (2013). disaster risks management. chapter book, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4339-4_300.
Otundo richard, M. (2024). strategic intelligence systems and performance of donor funded project, an empirical review from project management expertise poin of view. Technical report, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.14452.36489.
patrick, s., & et al. (2022). Principles of risk decision-making. journal of toxicology abd environmental hzalth part B, doi:10.1080/10937404.2022.2107591.
Polukarov, O., & et al. (2022). Assessment of occuptional ( industrial) risks: new approaches, improvements, methodilogy. Law.Human.Environmental, doi:10.31548/law2022.02.006, vol 13(no 2).
Propper, c., & et al. (2002). Does performance monitoring work? a review of the evidence from the uk public sector, excluding heath care. CMPO working paper series(no 2).
Rabihah, M. (2013). Risk management desicion making. conference paper, doi: 10.13033/isahp.y2013.073.
Samadi, h., & et al. (2014). Identifying and analyzing risks and responses for risk management in information technology outsourcing projects under fuzzy environment. international journal of information technology & decision making, doi: 10.1142/s021962201450076x.
Sreekumar, P. (2015). Risk management in practice: process and tools. research.
steven, K., & Thompson, w. (2012). wiley series in probability and statistics (éd. 3 rd edition). (I. publication, Éd.) canada: thiom wiley ans sons.
Stolen, k., & et al. (2015). Risk evaluation. chapter, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23571-7_9.
suci damayanti, e. (2023). risk management : in an overview of literature review. formosa journal of science and technolog, doi: https://doi.org/10.55927/ fjst.v2i4.3837, vol 2(no 4).
sujeet singh kanhaya, k. (2023). Risk management: a critical component of busines.
Tabish, s., & Syed, n. (2013). Disaster preparedness: current trends and future directions. international journal of science and research, vol 4(issue 6).
Tambunan, F., & et all. (2023). The influence of risk management in decision making on entrepreneurial success with product promotion as a moderatnig variable. journal of education, humanities and social science, doi: 10.34007/jehss.v.6i1.1820, vol 6(no 1).
Terje, A. (2009). Perspectives on risk in a desicion-making context-review and discussion. safety science, doi: 10.1016/J.ssci./2008.10.008, vol 47(no 6).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v6i2.543
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

Journal of Applied Data Sciences
| ISSN | : | 2723-6471 (Online) |
| Publisher | : | Bright Publisher |
| Website | : | http://bright-journal.org/JADS |
| : | taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact) | |
| support@bright-journal.org (technical issues) |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0




.png)