Biophysical Model of Mount Babaris for Predicting Carbon Potential using Remote Sensing

Ahmad Jauhari, Isna Syauqiah, La Taati, Munsyi Munsyi

Abstract


The biophysical model of Mount Babaris aims to predict carbon potential using remote sensing technology to address high levels of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2. This study combines satellite data with field measurements to create a validated model analyzing Forest Canopy Height (FCH), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Vegetation Density (VD), and Land Surface Temperature (LST). A multiple regression analysis shows a strong correlation between these parameters and VD, with an R² value of 0.8673, indicating that 86.73% of the variation in vegetation density can be explained by these variables. Field validation, including drone photographs, crown and stem base density measurements, and plant size, ensures the accuracy of the satellite-derived data. The model uses the equation VD = 123.295486 x NDVI - 0.413961 x LST - 0.410253 x FCH - 3.173195, validated through field data. For processing field measurements, the equation LBDstemCor = 0.007645 x LBDcrown + 0.034348 x VD - 1.575439, with an R² value of 0.9564, further demonstrates its accuracy. To estimate carbon potential in kilograms per pixel (CPP), the equation CPP = LBDstemCor x FCHcor x 0.7 x 680 x 1.34 x 0.47 was used. The predicted carbon potential for Mount Babaris (1,576 ha) ranges from 607,767.55 to 607,829.54 tons, reflecting the model's precision in estimating carbon storage. This model plays a crucial role in monitoring and predicting carbon potential, supporting environmental management and climate change mitigation efforts. By integrating GIS and remote sensing, the model offers a scalable, replicable methodology adaptable to other regions with similar characteristics. It enhances the accuracy of carbon stock estimations and provides essential data for developing strategies to increase carbon sequestration, contributing to global climate change mitigation. The combination of satellite data, field measurements, and statistical analysis makes this model an invaluable tool for effective ecosystem conservation and restoration.


Keywords


Forest Planning; Biophysical Model; GreenHouse Gases; Remote Sensing; Carbon potential

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Wang, N. Balta-Ozkan, J. Yildirim, F. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Can Compulsory Ecological Compensation for Land Damaged by Mining Activities Mitigate CO2 Emissions in China?,” Front Environ Sci, vol. 9, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.778937.

H. Rahmayanti and F. Ilyasa, “Pemberdayaan pengetahuan masyarakat terkait perubahan iklim,” PERDULI: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, vol. 3, no. 02, 2022, doi: 10.21009/perduli.v3i02.29884.

C. Le Quéré et al., “Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement,” Nat Clim Chang, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 647–653, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0797-x.

R. J. Nawrotzki, J. DeWaard, M. Bakhtsiyarava, and J. T. Ha, “Climate shocks and rural-urban migration in Mexico: exploring nonlinearities and thresholds,” Clim Change, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 243–258, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1849-0.

E. Badewa, A. Unc, M. Cheema, V. Kavanagh, and L. Galagedara, “Soil Moisture Mapping Using Multi-Frequency and Multi-Coil Electromagnetic Induction Sensors on Managed Podzols,” Agronomy, vol. 8, no. 10, 2018, doi: 10.3390/agronomy8100224.

H. J. Yoon and J. Chae, “Simulation Study for Semiconductor Manufacturing System: Dispatching Policies for a Wafer Test Facility,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11041119.

G. T. Pecl et al., “Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being,” Science (1979), vol. 355, no. 6332, p. eaai9214, 2017, doi: 10.1126/science.aai9214.

C. Bellard, C. Bertelsmeier, P. Leadley, W. Thuiller, and F. Courchamp, “Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity.,” Ecol Lett, vol. 15 4, pp. 365–377, 2012.

D. Sutaryo, PENGHITUNGAN BIOMASSA Sebuah pengantar untuk studi karbon dan perdagangan karbon. Bogor: Wetlands International Indonesia Programme, 2009.

N. Hidayati, M. Mansur, and T. Juhaeti, “Variasi serapan karbondioksida (co 2 ) jenis-jenis pohon di ‘ecopark’, cibinong dan kaitannya dengan potensi mitigasi gas rumah kaca,” Buletin Kebun Raya, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 13, 2013.

D. Karmila, A. Jauhari, and R. Kanti, “ESTIMASI NILAI CADANGAN KARBON MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS NDVI ( NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX ) DI KHDTK UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT Estimated Value of Carbon Stock Using Analysis of NDVI ( Normalized Difference Vegetation Index ) in KHDTK Lambung M,” vol. 03, no. 3, pp. 451–459, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.20257/10.20527/jss.v6i3.

A. Kumar, S. Uniyal, and B. Lal, “Stratification of Forest Density and its validation by NDVI analysis in a part of Western Himalayas, India using Remote Sensing & GIS Techniques,” Int J Remote Sens, vol. 28, pp. 2485–2495–2485–2495, 2007, doi: 10.1080/01431160600693583.

A. Arnanto, “Pemanfaatan Transformasi Normalized Difference Vegetation Index(Ndvi) Citra Landsat Tm Untuk Zonasi Vegetasi Di Lereng Merapi Bagian Selatan,” Geomedia: Majalah Ilmiah dan Informasi Kegeografian, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 155–170, 2015, doi: 10.21831/gm.v11i2.3448.

I. S. Zonneveld, “The land unit — A fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications,” Landsc Ecol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 67–86, 1989, doi: 10.1007/BF00131171.

Pratiwi et al., “Managing and Reforesting Degraded Post-Mining Landscape in Indonesia: A Review,” Land (Basel), vol. 10, no. 6, p. 658, 2021, doi: 10.3390/land10060658.

L. Zhang, H. Lin, and D. Li, “Vegetation Indices,” Library, vol. 4897, pp. 211–218, 2003.

D. L. Spittlehouse, R. D. Winkler, and R. S. Adams, Forest, Edge and Opening Microclimate at Sicamous Creek. British Columbia, Forest Science Program, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hIQkC_32r3MC

A. Wibowo, “APLIKASI IPCC GUIDELINE 2006 UNTUK PERHITUNGAN EMISI GAS RUMAH KACA KEHUTANAN DI SUMATERA SELATAN,” Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 166–186, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.20886/jakk.2013.10.2.166-186.

S. Latifah and N. Sulistiyono, “Carbon sequestration potential in aboveground biomass of hybrid eucalyptus plantation forest,” Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2013, doi: 10.7226/jtfm.19.1.54.

R. E. McRoberts, E. O. Tomppo, A. C. Vibrans, and J. V. de Freitas, “Considerations on the design of tropical forest inventories,” Pesqui Florest Bras, vol. 33, no. 74 SE-Artigos de Revisão, pp. 189–202, 2013, doi: 10.4336/2013.pfb.33.74.430.

I. Hilwan and S. Nurjannah, “REVEGETASI LAHAN PASCA TAMBANG DI PT JORONG BARUTAMA GRESTON , KALIMANTAN SELATAN,” Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, vol. 05, no. 3, pp. 188–195, 2014.

M. A. Qirom, M. B. Saleh, and B. Kuncahyo, “( Application of alos palsar image for estimation of carbon stock in acacia forest ),” pp. 121–134, 2012.

L. Frate et al., “Spatially explicit estimation of forest age by integrating remotely sensed data and inverse yield modeling techniques,” IForest, vol. 9, no. Feb 2016, pp. 63–71, 2016, doi: 10.3832/ifor1529-008.

M. Kukkonen, E. Kotivuori, M. Maltamo, L. Korhonen, and P. Packalen, “Volumes by tree species can be predicted using photogrammetric UAS data, sentinel-2 images and prior field measurements,” Silva Fennica, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.14214/sf.10360.

K. B. Byrd et al., “A remote sensing-based model of tidal marsh aboveground carbon stocks for the conterminous United States,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 139, pp. 255–271, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.019.

M. Simard et al., “Mangrove Canopy Height Globally Related to Precipitation, Temperature and Cyclone Frequency,” Nat Geosci, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41561-018-0279-1.

H. Zhu, B. Zhang, W. Song, Q. Xie, X. Chang, and R. Zhao, “Forest Canopy Height Estimation by Integrating Structural Equation Modeling and Multiple Weighted Regression,” Forests, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 369, 2024, doi: 10.3390/f15020369.

F. Chen, X. Zhang, L. Wang, B. Du, S. Dang, and L. Wang, “Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Resolution ICESat-2 Canopy Height Data: A Case Study of the Taranaki Region,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 15, no. 24, p. 5686, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15245686.

J. Zhao, L. Zhao, E. Chen, Z. Li, K. Xu, and X. Ding, “An Improved Generalized Hierarchical Estimation Framework With Geostatistics for Mapping Forest Parameters and Its Uncertainty: A Case Study of Forest Canopy Height,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 14, no. 3, p. 568, 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14030568.

R. A. Spriggs, D. A. Coomes, T. Jones, J. P. Caspersen, and M. C. Vanderwel, “An Alternative Approach to Using LiDAR Remote Sensing Data to Predict Stem Diameter Distributions Across a Temperate Forest Landscape,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 9, no. 9, p. 944, 2017, doi: 10.3390/rs9090944.

K. Begović et al., “Large Old Trees Increase Growth Under Shifting Climatic Constraints: Aligning Tree Longevity and Individual Growth Dynamics in Primary Mountain Spruce Forests,” Glob Chang Biol, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 143–164, 2022, doi: 10.1111/gcb.16461.

A. M. Osuri and M. Sankaran, “Seed Size Predicts Community Composition and Carbon Storage Potential of Tree Communities in Rain Forest Fragments in India’s Western Ghats,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 837–845, 2016, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12626.

H. H. Nurjanto et al., “Contribution of a Forest Rehabilitated With Various Schemes of Agroforestry in Storing Carbon,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1145, no. 1, p. 012009, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1145/1/012009.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v5i4.321

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0