Adaptive Marker-Controlled Watershed Combined with Voxel Quantification for Automated Fetal Measurement

Febri Hadi, Sumijan Sumijan, Iskandar Fitri
Pages 1330-1348
Abstract Views 326
PDF Downloads 188
Crossref Citations -
DOI https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i2.1224

Abstract


Accurate and consistent fetal biometric measurement is essential for assessing fetal growth and gestational age in prenatal care. However, ultrasound (US) imaging presents several challenges, including speckle noise, shadowing artifacts, and low tissue contrast, which often degrade segmentation accuracy. Classical watershed algorithms, though effective for edge detection, tend to produce over-segmentation in such complex textures. The dataset used in this study consisted of 272 ultrasound images of patients from M. Djamil Hospital, Padang, West Sumatra. The dataset covers various phases of fetal development, from the first trimester to the third trimester. All images correspond exclusively to fetal ultrasound examinations and were used solely for automated fetal biometric analysis. To overcome these issues, this study introduced an Adaptive Marker-Controlled Watershed (AMCW) algorithm combined with Voxel Quantification (VQ) to achieve more reliable and automated fetal measurements. The proposed AMCW method integrates adaptive marker generation based on morphological gradient and local intensity statistics, enabling dynamic control of internal and external markers across varying fetal regions. After segmentation, spatially calibrated pixel-based quantification was employed to estimate the dimensional properties of segmented fetal structures. The method was applied exclusively to 2D B-mode ultrasound datasets across multiple gestational ages, targeting four key fetal parameters: Biparietal Diameter (BPD), Head Circumference (HC), Abdominal Circumference (AC), and Femur Length (FL). Although the present study is limited to 2D ultrasound images, the proposed framework may be extendable to 3D ultrasound data in future research. The combination of adaptive marker-controlled watershed segmentation and voxel-based quantification presents a robust, interpretable, and computationally efficient framework for automated fetal measurement. The CNN achieved a classification accuracy of 98.75% on the independent testing dataset, indicating that the extracted biometric features contain strong discriminative information for automated fetal condition assessment. This hybrid approach minimizes operator dependency and measurement variability aligning with clinical measurement trends.

Keywords


Fetal; Ultrasound; Marker Controlled Watershed; Voxel Quantification; Automation

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Shrivastava and M. Laddad, “Comparison of foetal kidney length with foetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference, and femur length) in the third trimester of pregnancy,” Natl. J. Med. Res., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 111–118, 2023, doi : 10.55489/njmr.13042023980.

S. Ye, J. Y. Lim, and W. Huang, “Statistical considerations for repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative imaging biomarkers,” BJR Open, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 20210083, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210083.

R. Yousefpour Shahrivar, F. Karami, and E. Karami, “Enhancing fetal anomaly detection in ultrasonography images: A review of machine learning-based approaches,” Biomimetics, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 519, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8070519.

F. Maleki, L. Moy, R. Forghani, T. Ghosh, K. Ovens, S. Langer, and T. Kline, “RIDGE: Reproducibility, integrity, dependability, generalizability, and efficiency assessment of medical image segmentation models,” J. Imaging Inform. Med., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2524–2536, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01282-9.

F. Campa, A. Sampieri, G. Cerullo, L. Zoffoli, G. Coratella, and A. Paoli, “Determining body composition using different bioimpedance technologies: Is an agreement possible?,” Clin. Nutr., 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2025.10.021.

S. Jardim, J. António, and C. Mora, “Image thresholding approaches for medical image segmentation: Short literature review,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 219, pp. 1485–1492, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.439.

Y. Xu, R. Quan, W. Xu, Y. Huang, X. Chen, and F. Liu, “Advances in medical image segmentation: A comprehensive review of traditional, deep learning and hybrid approaches,” Bioengineering, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1034, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11101034.

S. K. B. Degala, R. P. Tewari, P. Kamra, U. Kasiviswanathan, and R. Pandey, “Segmentation and estimation of fetal biometric parameters using an attention gate double U-Net with guided decoder architecture,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 180, p. 109000, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109000.

M. A. Qazi, M. T. Alam, I. Almakky, W. G. Diehl, L. Bricker, and M. Yaqub, “Multi-task learning approach for unified biometric estimation from fetal ultrasound anomaly scans,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Med. Imaging Comput.-Aided Diagnosis, Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 52–61, Dec. 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1335-6_5.

S. F. Ahmed, M. S. B. Alam, M. Hassan, M. R. Rozbu, T. Ishtiak, N. Rafa, and A. H. Gandomi, “Deep learning modelling techniques: Current progress, applications, advantages, and challenges,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 13521–13617, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10466-8.

T. Talaei Khoei, H. Ould Slimane, and N. Kaabouch, “Deep learning: Systematic review, models, challenges, and research directions,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 35, no. 31, pp. 23103–23124, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08957-4.

S. Kim, C. Fischetti, M. Guy, E. Hsu, J. Fox, and S. D. Young, “Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in low-resource settings: A scoping review,” Diagnostics, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 1669, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14151669.

P. Garg, M. K. Sharma, and P. Kumar, “Transparency in diagnosis: Unveiling the power of deep learning and explainable AI for medical image interpretation,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., pp. 1–17, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09896-5.

A. F. Mohamed, F. Wanis, and M. M. Ashour, “Enhance watershed algorithms using principal component analysis capabilities,” Al-Qadisiyah J. Eng. Sci., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.2024.145116.1055.

E. Ellis, A. Bulpitt, N. Parsa, M. F. Byrne, and S. Ali, “A self-supervised framework for improved generalisability in ultrasound B-mode image segmentation,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2502.02489, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.02489.

A. Kornilov, I. Safonov, and I. Yakimchuk, “A review of watershed implementations for segmentation of volumetric images,” J. Imaging, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 127, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050127.

B. Abhisheka, S. K. Biswas, B. Purkayastha, D. Das, and A. Escargueil, “Recent trend in medical imaging modalities and their applications in disease diagnosis: A review,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, no. 14, pp. 43035–43070, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17326-1.

V. Majanga and E. Mnkandla, “Automatic watershed segmentation of cancerous lesions in unsupervised breast histology images,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 22, p. 10394, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210394.

G. F. Cacao, D. Du, and N. Nair, “Unsupervised image segmentation on 2D echocardiogram,” Algorithms, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 515, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/a17110515.

G. Chen, L. Li, J. Zhang, and Y. Dai, “Rethinking the unpretentious U-net for medical ultrasound image segmentation,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 142, p. 109728, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109728.

S. Xiao, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, Z. Zhang, H. Cao, M. Xie, and L. Zhang, “Application and progress of artificial intelligence in fetal ultrasound,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 3298, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15700.

J. E. Im, M. Khalifa, A. V. Gregory, B. J. Erickson, and T. L. Kline, “A systematic review on the use of registration-based change tracking methods in longitudinal radiological images,” Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2549–2562, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01333-1.

D. H. Zou, Y. Y. Liu, N. G. Liu, and Y. J. Chen, “Virtopsy: development and application in forensic practice,” Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 343–350, 2024, doi : 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_154_24.

G. Huang, W. Zhang, H. Yang, Y. Chen, H. Guan, C. Lu, and Q. Guo, “A LiDAR-based framework for visualizing and quantifying forest void space: an intrinsic component of forest ecosystems,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 143, p. 104845, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104845.

N. Rossberg, S. Corrie, L. Grøndahl, and I. Jayawardena, “Automated analysis of pore structures in biomaterials,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 13, no. 31, pp. 9377–9391, 2025, doi : 10.1039/D5TB00848D.

J. Li and X. Gui, “Fully automatic grayscale image segmentation: dynamic thresholding for background adaptation, improved image center point selection, and noise-resilient start/end point determination,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 20, p. 9303, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209303.

J. J. Lifton, “Evaluating the standard uncertainty due to the voxel size in dimensional computed tomography,” Precision Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 245–250, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2022.11.001.

K. Ntemos, F. Xu, N. Z. Bazzi, G. Fucile, H. P. Maretic, I. Dokmanic, and A. N. Sawh, “Rapid canalization of chromosome conformation-transcription fingerprints during embryogenesis revealed by fully-automated cell identity decoding with CeSCALE,” bioRxiv, p. 2025-10, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.22.684035.

X. Liu, L. Qu, Z. Xie, J. Zhao, Y. Shi, and Z. Song, “Towards more precise automatic analysis: a systematic review of deep learning-based multi-organ segmentation,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 52, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01238-8.

R. G. Gomes, B. Vwalika, C. Lee, A. Willis, M. Sieniek, J. T. Price, and S. Shetty, “A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment,” Communications Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 128, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00194-5.

S. Park, T. Nguyen, T. M. George, O. A. Mayo, J. E. Mutersbaugh, G. Luo, et al., “From traditional to cutting-edge: A review of fetal well-being assessment techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2024.3512414.

A. I. Belal, S. E. Elnabawy, and H. M. Abd-Elfatah, “Transcerebellar diameter versus biparietal diameter and femur length for gestational age assessment in third trimester of pregnancy,” Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, vol. 98, no. 1, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2025.420077.

I. Pradnyana, E. S. Widiyanti, I. Wijaya, M. F. B. Gunawan, I. Paramyta, and N. N. D. W. Pradnyani, “The value of ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters as a predictive tool in preeclamptic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy,” International Journal of Women’s Health & Reproduction Sciences, vol. 13, no. 3, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2025.8854.

U. B. Balagalla, J. V. D. Jayasooriya, C. de Alwis, and A. Subasinghe, “Automated segmentation of standard scanning planes to measure biometric parameters in foetal ultrasound images—A survey,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1690–1707, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2023.2179343.

F. Liu and D. Panagiotakos, “Real-world data: A brief review of the methods, applications, challenges and opportunities,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 287, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-022-01768-6.

Y. Xu, R. Quan, W. Xu, Y. Huang, X. Chen, and F. Liu, “Advances in medical image segmentation: A comprehensive review of traditional, deep learning and hybrid approaches,” Bioengineering, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1034, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11101034.

Y. Wu and Q. Li, “The algorithm of watershed color image segmentation based on morphological gradient,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 21, p. 8202, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218202.

N. Gaikwad and S. Vijayalakshmi, “An examination of methodological approaches for segmentating fetal brain MRI images–analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Trends in Quantum Computing and Emerging Business Technologies, Mar. 2024, pp. 1–6, doi : https://doi.org/10.1109/TQCEBT59414.2024.10545035.

O. A. M. F. Alnaggar, B. N. Jagadale, M. A. N. Saif, O. A. Ghaleb, A. A. Ahmed, H. A. A. Aqlan, and H. D. E. Al-Ariki, “Efficient artificial intelligence approaches for medical image processing in healthcare: Comprehensive review, taxonomy, and analysis,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, no. 8, p. 221, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10814-2.

S. Krig, “Image Preprocessing, Morphology, Segmentation, Colorimetry,” in Computer Vision Metrics: Survey, Taxonomy, and Analysis of Computer Vision, Visual Neuroscience, and Visual AI, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2025, pp. 35–97, doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3393-8_2.

A. Ju and Z. Wang, “A novel fully convolutional network based on marker-controlled watershed segmentation algorithm for industrial soot robot target segmentation,” Evolutionary Intelligence, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 963–980, 2023,doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-022-00708-z.

T. Destefanis, S. Guliyeva, P. Boccardo, and V. Fissore, “Advancing flood detection and mapping: A review of earth observation services, 3D data integration, and AI-based techniques,” Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 17, art. no. 2943, 2025, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17172943.

J. P. S. Grace and P. Ezhilarasi, “Enhanced marker-controlled watershed segmentation algorithm for brain tumor segmentation,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Intelligence in Communications and Business Analytics, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, Jan. 2022, pp. 154–166 doi : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10766-5_12.

F. Galati, S. Ourselin, and M. A. Zuluaga, “From accuracy to reliability and robustness in cardiac magnetic resonance image segmentation: A review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 8, p. 3936, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/app12083936.

N. Marahrens, D. Jones, N. Murasovs, C. S. Biyani, and P. Valdastri, “An ultrasound-guided system for autonomous marking of tumor boundaries during robot-assisted surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.1109/TMRB.2024.3468397.

H. Abdushkour, T. A. Soomro, A. Ali, F. Ali Jandan, H. Jelinek, F. Memon, et al., “Enhancing fine retinal vessel segmentation: Morphological reconstruction and double thresholds filtering strategy,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 7, Art. no. e0288792, 2023, doi : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288792.

S. Jardim, J. António, and C. Mora, “Graphical image region extraction with k-means clustering and watershed,” Journal of Imaging, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 163, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8060163.

M. Y. Shakor and M. I. Khaleel, “Recent advances in big medical image data analysis through deep learning and cloud computing,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 24, p. 4860, 2024, doi : https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13244860.

M. Goto, O. Abe, A. Hagiwara, S. Fujita, K. Kamagata, M. Hori, et al., “Advantages of using both voxel- and surface-based morphometry in cortical morphology analysis: A review of various applications,” Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41–57, 2022, doi : https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0096.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v7i2.1224

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Barcode

Journal of Applied Data Sciences

ISSN:2723-6471 (Online)
Publisher:Bright Publisher
Website:http://bright-journal.org/JADS
Email:taqwa@amikompurwokerto.ac.id (principal contact)
  support@bright-journal.org (technical issues)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0