Classification of Tweets Causing Deadlocks in Jakarta Streets with the Help of Algorithm C4.5

Qurrotul Aini, Jehad A H Hammad, Taslim Taher, Mohammed Ikhlayel


Congestion seems to be a daily occurrence in the Indonesian city of Jakarta. As a consequence, the rider has access to essential information regarding traffic conditions at all times, which is beneficial. Through social media platforms such as Twitter, this information is readily available to the public. On the other hand, the information offered on Twitter is still uncategorized text. DKI Jakarta, as a consequence, developed a congestion classification system that included data mining techniques, a classification approach based on the decision tree technique, and C4.5 as a component. This C4.5 method transforms a large amount of information into a decision tree that shows the rules. Geocoding will be utilized to illustrate the locations that have been gathered, and a data split with a confusion matrix will be used to assess how well the categorization process has worked. According to the study's results, the average accuracy rate is 99.08 percent, the average precision rate is 99.46 percent, and the average recall rate is 97.99 percent.

Article Metrics

Abstract: 122 Viewers PDF: 54 Viewers


C4.5; Sentiment Analysis; Deadlock; Classification; Traffic Prediction.

Full Text:



M. I. Zulfa, R. Hartanto, and A. E. Permanasari, “Caching strategy for Web application – a systematic literature review,” Int. J. Web Inf. Syst., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 545–569, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJWIS-06-2020-0032.

S. Yamamoto, K. Wakabayashi, T. Satoh, Y. Nozaki, and N. Kando, “Twitter user growth analysis based on diversities in posting activities,” Int. J. Web Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 370–386, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJWIS-04-2017-0034.

Y. Wang and J. Zhang, “Exploring topics related to data mining on Wikipedia,” Electron. Libr., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 667–688, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/EL-09-2016-0188.

R. Varma, Y. Verma, P. Vijayvargiya, and P. P. Churi, “A systematic survey on deep learning and machine learning approaches of fake news detection in the pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 617–646, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJICC-04-2021-0069.

D. Rossmann and S. W. H. Young, “Social media optimization: making library content shareable and engaging,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 526–544, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1108/LHT-05-2015-0053.

D. Ramachandran and P. Ramasubramanian, “Event detection from Twitter – a survey,” Int. J. Web Inf. Syst., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 262–280, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/IJWIS-11-2017-0075.

S. Okazaki, A. M. Díaz-Martín, M. Rozano, and H. D. Menéndez-Benito, “Using Twitter to engage with customers: a data mining approach,” Internet Res., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 416–434, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0249.

K. Nagaraj, B. Bhattacharjee, A. Sridhar, and S. GS, “Detection of phishing websites using a novel twofold ensemble model,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 321–357, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/JSIT-09-2017-0074.

A. Kumar, M. A. Kaviani, E. Bottani, M. K. Dash, and E. K. Zavadskas, “Investigating the role of social media in polio prevention in India: a Delphi-DEMATEL approach,” Kybernetes, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1053–1072, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/K-06-2017-0210.

C. Kaiser and F. Bodendorf, “Mining consumer dialog in online forums,” Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 275–297, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1108/10662241211235653.

S. Joo, N. Choi, and T. H. Baek, “Library marketing via social media,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 940–955, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/OIR-10-2017-0288.

F. A. Johannsen, “Process-related value propositions of enterprise social media use for the external communication with end consumers,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 183–215, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-03-2016-0049.

G. Ignatow, N. Evangelopoulos, and K. Zougris, “Sentiment Analysis of Polarizing Topics in Social Media: News Site Readers’ Comments on the Trayvon Martin Controversy,” in Communication and Information Technologies Annual, vol. 11, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2016, pp. 259–284.

N. Ferdinand and J. Tucker, “Digital Engagement Conference: A Road Map for the Future of Festivals, July 9‐11 2014, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom,” J. Tour. Futur., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 162–166, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1108/JTF-12-2014-0012.

M. Dai, W. He, X. Tian, A. Giraldi, and F. Gu, “Working with communities on social media,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 782–796, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1108/OIR-01-2016-0002.

N. Choi and S. Joo, “Understanding public libraries’ challenges, motivators, and perceptions toward the use of social media for marketing,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 352–367, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1108/LHT-11-2017-0237.

T. Cawsey and J. Rowley, “Social media brand building strategies in B2B companies,” Mark. Intell. Plan., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 754–776, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1108/MIP-04-2015-0079.

[J. Bhattacharjya, A. Ellison, and S. Tripathi, “An exploration of logistics-related customer service provision on Twitter,” Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., vol. 46, no. 6/7, pp. 659–680, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2015-0007.

A. Al-Rawi, J. Groshek, and L. Zhang, “What the fake? Assessing the extent of networked political spamming and bots in the propagation of #fakenews on Twitter,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 53–71, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/OIR-02-2018-0065.

B. Abu-Salih, P. Wongthongtham, and C. Yan Kit, “Twitter mining for ontology-based domain discovery incorporating machine learning,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 949–981, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0489.


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Applied Data Sciences

2723-6471 (Online)
Organized by : MetaBright
Published by : Bright Publisher
Website :
Email :

 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0